New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT

116 Taxmann.com 151Supreme Court of India2020#733 most cited

What is New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Reassessment initiated under Section 147/148 is invalid if the Assessing Officer relies on material obtained post-recording of reasons, or if it amounts to a mere change of opinion on facts fully and truly disclosed by the assessee during the original assessment. An assessee's obligation extends only to the full and true disclosure of primary facts, not to provide further assistance or inferences.

139

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT · Section 147 · Section 148 · Income Tax Act 1961 · reassessment validity · mere change of opinion · full and true disclosure · primary facts · reasons recorded · material post-recording · Kelvinator principle · first proviso to section 147

Also reported as

424 ITR 607271 Taxmann 1

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT

MATA BALA SUNDRI RICE MILL,VILLAGE KANIPLA, DISTRICT YAMUNA NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-3, YAMUNA NAGAR, YAMUNAGAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 906/CHANDI/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 906/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mata Bala Sundri Rice Mill, The Ito, C/O Jagdamba Rice & General Mills, Vs Ward-3, Village-Kanipla, Po-Sarawan, Yamuna Nagar. Yamuna Nagar. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aatfm9813G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Dhruv Goel, Ca Revenue By : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. Cit Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 12.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.02.2026

For Appellant: Shri Dhruv Goel, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…come has escaped assessment on account of failure of the assessee to disclose all material facts fully and truly. In support of his contention, he relied upon a large number of decisions, namely, Duli Chand Singhania Vs ACIT 269 ITR 192 (P&H) and NDTV Vs DCIT 424 ITR 607 (S.C.), Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer 106 ITR 1. 3. The ld. DR, on the other hand relied upon the orders of Revenue Authorities and submitted that AO got an information that assessee has not disclosed the sale of broken rice which was a bye-product during hulling the rice. Hence, AO has rightly reopened the assessment.…

R.VISWANATHAN,,CHENNAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4),, CHENNAI

ITA 1321/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1321 To 1324/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18 R. Viswanathan, Flat No.A-4, Rams Anjali Atrium No.8, Sundaram Salai, R.A. Puram, Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Adlpv 6760 G] V. The Dcit, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai. (अपीलाथ/Appellant) (यथ/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1556 & 1597/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2015-16 The Dcit, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai. V. R. Viswanathan, Flat No.A-4, Rams Anjali Atrium No.8, Sundaram Salai, R.A. Puram, Chennai-600 028. [Pan: Adlpv 6760 G] (अपीलाथ/Appellant) : (यथ/Respondent) अपीलाथ की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri. V. Naga Prasad, Advocate/Ar थ की ओर से /Department By : Smt. E. Pavuna Sundari, Cit/Dr सुनवाईकतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29.10.2025 / 17.11.2025 घोषणाकतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 22.01.2026 :: 2 ::

For Appellant: Shri. V. Naga PrasadFor Respondent: Smt. E. Pavuna Sundari
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘ए’ यायपीठ, चेई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI श्री एबी टी. वक, ाियक सद एव ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद के सम BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1321 to 1324/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2017-18 R. Viswanathan, Flat No.A-4, Rams Anjali Atrium No.8, Sundaram Salai, R.A. Puram, Chennai-600 028. [PAN: ADLPV 6760 G] v. The DCIT, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai. (अपीलाथ/Appellant) (यथ/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1556 & 1597/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2015-16 T…

Showing 120 of 139 · Page 1 of 7

New Delhi Television Ltd. v. DCIT (116 Taxmann.com 151) — Cited in 139 Judgments | BharatTax