Mis Yahoo India Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), Standard Chartered Bank

307 ITR 59High Court2008#1254 most cited
90

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Mis Yahoo India Pvt Ltd v DCIT · 307 ITR 59 · Section 9(1)(vi) · Section 9(1)(vii) · use of equipment · right to use · control and possession · royalty income · income deemed to accrue in India · Authority for Advance Rulings

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 12Section 143(2)Section 148Section 148A(b)

Issues it is cited on

section 206ause of equipmentsection 206aasection 9(2)section 9(l)(vii)section 9(1)(vii)(b)section 9(l)section 9(1)(vi)section 9(l)(vi)section 90(2)section 44bbsection 195(2)

Judgments citing Mis Yahoo India Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), Standard Chartered Bank

Vodafone Idea Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-14(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1917/HYD/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…id the monthly recurring charges to BT for the "use" of any such equipment. It was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questi…

Vodafone Idea Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-14(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1916/HYD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…id the monthly recurring charges to BT for the "use" of any such equipment. It was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questi…

Vodafone Idea Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-14(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1915/HYD/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…id the monthly recurring charges to BT for the "use" of any such equipment. It was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questi…

Vodafone Idea Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-14(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1914/HYD/2019[2005-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2005-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…id the monthly recurring charges to BT for the "use" of any such equipment. It was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questi…

Vodafone Idea Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-14(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1913/HYD/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)
Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…id the monthly recurring charges to BT for the "use" of any such equipment. It was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questi…

M/S. Grant Thornton Advisory (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 3259/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2011-12

Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

…) Cushman & Wakefiled (S) Pte. Ltd. (2008) 305 ITR 208 (b) Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. Vs. DDIT (International Taxation) (2013) 141 ITD 598 (Pune) (c) CIT Vs De Beers India Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 346ITR 467 (Karn) (d) ISR0 Satellite Centre (ISAC) (2008) 307 ITR 59 (AAR) (e) Intertek Testing Services India (P) Ltd. Vs. Authority for Advance Rulings (2008) 307 ITR 418 (f) BharatiAxa General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2010) 326 ITR 477 (AAR) (g) Cable & Wireless Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (2009) 315 ITR 72 (h) Invensys Systems Inc., (2009) 317 ITR 438 (i) Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd. Vs ADIT (2012) 18 ITR (Trib) 414 (…

M/S Belgacom International Carrier Services Sa, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(1) International Taxation, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2884/BANG/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. B.R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(It)A No. 2884/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/S. Belgacom The Deputy International Carrier Commissioner Of Services Sa, Income Tax, Rue Lebeau 4, Circle -1(1), 1000 Brussels, International Taxation, Vs. Belgium. Bangalore. Appellant Respondent : Shri V. Sridharan, Senior Assessee By Advocate : Shri Pradeep Kumar, Cit-Dr & Revenue By Smt. Vandana Sagar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 16-03-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 26-04-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Non Resident Assessee Against Order Dated 30.10.2017 Passed By Dcit (It), Circle -1(1), Bangalore On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “Being Aggrieved By The Order Of The Learned Dcit, Circle - 1(1), International Taxation, Bengaluru ('A0'), Read With The Order Of The Learned Dispute Resolution Panel ('Drp*), Bengaluru, The Assessee Begs To Prefer The Present Appeal On The Following Grounds: 1. The Learned Ao Erred In Exercising, Jurisdiction U/S 147 Of The Act In The Case Of The Appellant. 2. The Lower Authorities Erred In Holding That A Sum Of Rs. 6,87,13,119/- Received By The Appellant From Its Customer In India Is In The Nature Of 'Royalty' Within The Meaning Of Section 9(1)(Vi) Of The It Act & Accordingly Taxable In India Under The It Act.

For Respondent: Shri V. Sridharan, Senior
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 9(1)(v)Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

…n following decisions:  Decision of Authority For Advance Ruling(hereinafter referred to as AAR), in case of Cable & Wireless Networks India(P.)Ltd., In re, reported in (2009) 182 Taxman 76  Decision of AAR in case of ISRO Satellite Centre reported in 2008) 307 ITR 59  Decision of AAR in case of Dell International Services (India) P. Ltd.In.re. reported in (2008) 172 Taxman 418. He submitted that the above decisions, lay down that, in order to satisfy 'use or right to use', the control and possession of right, property or information should be with payer. 23. He submitted that, in case of DCIT v. PanAmSat Inte…

Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. ACIT (International Taxation), New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 634/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. ACIT, Circle- 1(3)(1), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 5815/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. DCIT (International Taxation), New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1008/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1731/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

M/S. Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. ADIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 458/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. DDIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 429/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

Ge Energy Management Services Inc., Gurgaon vs. ADIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 5544/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anupama Anand, CIT-DR
Section 154Section 195Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90

…words, payment of consideration would be regarded as fee for technical / included services' only if the twin test of rendering services and making technical knowledge available at the same time is satisfied (Emphasis supplied). ISRO Satellite Centre (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) • AAR reiterated the principle of "make available" and held that it implies that the technical knowledge, skill, etc. remains with the person utilizing the services even after the particular transaction is over. Merely enabling the use of services or products into which technical inputs have gone does not amount to "making available" techn…

Inmarsat Global Ltd., Mumbai vs. Dy CIT (It)-2(1)92), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7485/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Mar 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shree Manoj Kumar Aggarwalinmarsat Global Ltd., Vs. Dy. Cit(It)-2(1)(2) Ernst & Young Llp, R.No.1612, 17Th Floor, 14Th Floor, Ruby-29, Air India Bldg, Senapati Bapat Marg, Nariman Point, Dadar(W), Mumbai – Mumbai 400002. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaci6098K Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Ms. Aarati Sathe, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 271Section 9(1)(vi)

…der :- “10. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We find that the material facts of the present case are largely identical to the facts as considered by AAR in the ruling in the case of ISRO Satellite Centre(2008) 307 ITR 59 (AAR). We note that the reasoning and conclusion on facts similar Inmarsat Global Ltd., Mumbai to the facts in the present proceedings with ISRO which has been followed after a detailed discussion and in fact extracted by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. (2011) 332 ITR 340(Del.). We note that n…

M/S Ecorys Nederlands B.V., Delhi vs. ADIT (International Taxation), New Delhi

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in the terms indicated above

ITA 6494/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Nov 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleasstt. Year 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Satpal Gulati, CIT (DR)
Section 40

…eported in (2008) 305 ITR 208; b) Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. Vs. DDIT (International Taxation),reported in (2013) 141 ITD 598 (Pune); c) CIT Vs. De Beers India Minerals Pvt. Ltd., reported in (2012) 346 ITR 467 (Karn.) d) ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC), (2008) 307 ITR 59 (AAR) e) Intertek Testing Services India (P) Ltd., reported in Authority for Advance Rulings (2008) 307 ITR 418; f) BhartiAxa General Insurance Co. Ltd., reported in (2010) 326 ITR 477 (AAR); g) Cable & Wireless Networks India Pvt. Ltd., reported in (2009) 315 ITR 72; h) Invensys Systems Inc., reported in (2009) 317 ITR 438; i) Guy Carpenter & Co.…

Inmarsat Global Limited, Mumbai vs. DCIT (It) Circle 2(2)(1), Mumbai

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 7025/MUM/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Ravish Soodinmarsat Global Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income C/O Srbc & Associates Llp, Tax (International Taxation) 14Th Floor, The Ruby, Circle 2(2)(1), 17Th Floor, Vs. 20 Senapati Bapat Marg, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Dadar (W), Mumbai 400 028 Mumbai 400 021 Pan – Aaaci6098K (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala &For Respondent: Shri Avaneesh Tiwari, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 253Section 9(1)(vi)

…as royalty. Apart from that, it was submitted by the assessee that the A.O while characterising the amounts received by the assessee from TCL had failed to follow the advance ruling in the case of ISRO Satellite Centre [ISACT] Vs. DIT (Intl. Taxation) (2008) 307 ITR 59 (AAR), wherein the Hon‟ble Authority for Advance Ruling (for short „AAR‟) had held that the amount received by the assessee from ISRO in lieu of providing transponder services was not taxable either under the Act or the India-U.K. tax treaty. It was submitted by the assessee that the aforesaid order of the AAR had thereafter been affirmed by the H…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Grant Thornton India LLP, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6489/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 6489/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Vs M/S Grant Thornton India Llp, Tax, Circle-52(1), L-41, Connaught Circus, New Delhi New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aacfg9740K Assessee By : Sh. Sh. Vinod Bindal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 25.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar:

For Appellant: Sh. Sh. Vinod Bindal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR
Section 40Section 90

…ported in (2008) 305 ITR 208; b) Sandvik Australia Pty. Ltd. Vs. DDIT (International Taxation), reported in (2013) 141 ITD 598 (Pune); c) CIT Vs. De Beers India Minerals Pvt. Ltd., reported in (2012) 346 ITR 467 (Karn.) d) ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC), (2008) 307 ITR 59 (AAR) e) Intertek Testing Services India (P) Ltd., reported in Authority for Advance Rulings (2008) 307 ITR 418; f) BhartiAxa General Insurance Co. Ltd., reported in (2010) 326 ITR 477 (AAR); g) Cable & Wireless Networks India Pvt. Ltd., reported in (2009) 315 ITR 72; h) Invensys Systems Inc., reported in (2009) 317 ITR 438; i) Guy Carpenter & Co.…

Raskspace Us Inc, Mumbai vs. DCIT (It) 4(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3507/MUM/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: S/Shri PJ PardiwalaFor Respondent: S/Shri Kumar Sanjay, CIT DR &
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

…equipment to the customers. On this basis, it is argued by the appellant that the equipment is used by the appellant and it is only providing and rendering services to its customers and not allowing the customers to use the process. In the case of ISRO [2008] 307 ITR 59 (AAR), the AAR has narrated in detail the process of the operation of a satellite and the role played by the transponder therein. Rackspace, US Inc ITAs No. 1634/Mum/2016, 3507 & 1075/Mum/2017 The following features of the agreement entered into by the appellant with its clients need to be highlighted at this stage: (a) The appellant is a foreig…

Rackspace, Us Inc., Mumbai vs. DCIT (It) 4(1)(1), Mumbai

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are allowed as indicated above

ITA 1075/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: S/Shri PJ PardiwalaFor Respondent: S/Shri Kumar Sanjay, CIT DR &
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 9Section 9(1)(vi)

…equipment to the customers. On this basis, it is argued by the appellant that the equipment is used by the appellant and it is only providing and rendering services to its customers and not allowing the customers to use the process. In the case of ISRO [2008] 307 ITR 59 (AAR), the AAR has narrated in detail the process of the operation of a satellite and the role played by the transponder therein. Rackspace, US Inc ITAs No. 1634/Mum/2016, 3507 & 1075/Mum/2017 The following features of the agreement entered into by the appellant with its clients need to be highlighted at this stage: (a) The appellant is a foreig…