M/S Kemfin Services Pvt Ltd vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
In the result, the appeal is allowed
ITA/70/2011HC Karnataka11 Jun 2020
Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260ASection 88E
…T, ‘CIT VS. EXPRESS SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,’, 2013-TIOL-862-HC-DEL-IT, ‘DEEPLOK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD VS. CIT’, (2017) 393 ITR 395 (CAL), ‘ADITYA MEDISALES LTD. VS. DCIT’, (2016) 242 TAXMAN 228 (GUJ), ‘ CIT VS. JANNHAVI INVESTMENT (P,) LTD.’, (2008) 304 ITR 276 (BOM), ‘RANCHOD BHAI BHAIJIBHAI PATEL VS. CIT’, (1971) ITR 446 (GUJ), ‘M.VENKATESAN VS. CIT’, (1983) 144 ITR 886 (MAD), ‘CIT VS. SMT.M.SUIBAIDA BEEVI’, (1986) 60 ITR 557 (KERALA), ‘CIT VS. VISHWANATH’, (1993) 201 ITR 920 (ALL). 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the revenue submitted that when stock in trade is converted into sh…