DCIT 4(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. J.M. FINANCIAL LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 3925/MUM/2015Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 August 2023AY 2008-0925 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the transaction of sale of shares was genuine and not a colourable device for tax avoidance. The losses arising from the sale of shares were allowed to be set off against capital gains.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a holding company, sold shares of its joint venture company. The Assessing Officer treated the capital gain as business income, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal initially remitted the issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication in light of a Supreme Court decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the gain on sale of shares is capital gain or business income, and whether losses on sale of shares can be set off against capital gains.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 55(2)(aa)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & MS. PADMAVATHY S.

For Appellant: Dr K Shivram
For Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor CIT DR

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A. No.3987/Mum/2015
I.T.A. No.3925/Mum/2015

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER : MS PADMAVATHY S. (AM)

These cross appeals by the assesse and the Revenue are against the order of the Commisioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-9, Mumbai (in short, „the CIT(A)‟) dated 30/04/2015 for assessment year 2008-09. 2. The assessee is a holding company and has made in

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →