Sumitra Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat. Sanstha Maryadit, Solapur vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward - 1(4), Pandharpur
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Allowed
ITA 1148/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Nov 2022AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote. आयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No.1148/Pun/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Sumitra Gramin Bigar Sheti The Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs Ward-1(4), Pandharpur. Mahaveer Path, At Post Aklujk, Tal Malshiras, Dist Solapur – 413101. Pan: Aaaas 1014 K Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 10/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 04/11/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-7, Pune, Dated 26.04.2018 For The A.Y. 2010-11 Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(In Short “The Act”). The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Learned C.I.T.[A] Has Grossly Erred In Denying Deduction U/S 80P[2][A][I] Of The I.T. Act 1961 To The Appellant In Respect Of Interest Income Of Rs.1,08,53,328/- Earned From Fixed Deposits Kept By It With Nationalized Banks & Has Further Erred In Taxing The Said Income U/S 56 Of The I. T. Act, 1961. The Aforesaid Addition Being Patently Illegal, Bad In Law, Arbitrary, Perverse & Devoid Of Merits The Same May Please Be Deleted & It May Please Be Held That The Aforesaid Interest Income Is Exempt U/S
Section 250Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)
…No.1148/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2010-11 Sumitra Gramin Bigar S.S.P.S.Maryadit Mahaveer Path (A) taxmann 309 (Kar.) allowing the deduction u/s. 80P on interest income and the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. Vs. CIT (2014) 110 DTR 89 (Delhi) not allowing deduction u/s.80P on interest income, earned from banks under similar circumstances. Both the Hon’ble High Courts have taken into consideration the ratio laid down in the case of Totgar’s Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. 322 ITR 283 (SC). There being no direct judgment from the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court on the point, the…