TULJARAM CHTATURCHAND MAHAVIDYALAYA SEVAKANCHI SAHA PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 14 (5), PUNE

There is a delay of 08 days in . At the outset, the ld. Counsel submitted that the delay pertains to Covid-19 pandemic period. We are satisfied with the reason of the delay.

For the appeal at Sl.No.1, the assessee has filed written submissions and requested to decide the appeal based on the same.

Succinctly, the assessees in these appeals filed returns claiming deduction u/s.80P of the Act in relation to interest income earned from cooperative banks/nationalized banks. The Assessing

We have heard the ld. DR and Sh. Pramod S. Shingte in respect of and gone through the relevant material on records. Insofar as the allowability of deduction u/s.8P(2)(a)(i) is concerned, we find that the Pune Tribunal in Sureshdada Jain Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Vs. The Pr.CIT (ITA No.713/PUN/2016) has decided the question of availability of deduction u/s 80P on interest income by noticing that the Pune Bench in an earlier case of Shri Laxmi Narayan Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs. ITO (ITA No.604/PN/2014) has allowed similar deduction. In the said case, the Tribunal discussed the contrary views expressed by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. Vs. ITO (2015) 230 Taxman 309 (Kar.) allowing deduction u/s. 80P on interest income and that of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. Vs. CIT (2014) 110 DTR 89 (Delhi) not allowing deduction u/s.80P on interest income earned from banks. Both the Hon’ble High Courts took into consideration the ratio laid down in the case of Totgar’s Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. (supra). No direct judgment from the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court on the point having been 4 Saska Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit and others pointed out, the Tribunal in Shri Laxmi Narayan Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit (supra) preferred to go with the view in favour of the assessee by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the (supra). The position continues to remain the same before this Tribunal also. Respectfully following the precedent, we entitle the assesses to the deduction.

Coming to the cases of deduction u/s.80P(2)(d), it is observed that though co-operative banks, other than primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, are not eligible for deduction pursuant to insertion of section 80P(4) w.e.f. 1.4.2007, but this provision does not dent the otherwise eligibility u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act of a co- operative society on interest income on investments/deposits parked with a co-operative bank, which is a registered co-operative society as per section 2(19) of the Act, defining co-operative society to mean a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 or under any law for the time being in force.

We, thus, overturn the impugned orders and order to grant deduction u/s 80P of the Act in all such cases.

In the result, all the appeals are allowed.