Ltd. v. DCIT

76 Taxmann.com 268High Court2016#1095 most cited

What is Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

Where the Assessing Officer performs an elaborate analysis to determine disallowance under Section 14A, the mere absence of a specific record of dissatisfaction with the assessee's calculation does not nullify the disallowance, provided the statutory steps are followed.

101

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

India Bulls Financial Services Ltd v DCIT · Section 14A · Rule 8D · disallowance for exempt income · AO's satisfaction · recording dissatisfaction · elaborate analysis · procedural validity of disallowance

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Ltd. v. DCIT

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. H T Media Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 2768/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap & Ms Suchitra Kambledcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) Dcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) H. T. Media Ltd. Vs Dcit Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (Respondent) Aabch3165P (Appellant) Dcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12101) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) Vs Acit Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (Respondent) Aabch3165P (Appellant)

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32

…DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI P. M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (APPELLANT) Marg New Delhi AABCH3165P (RESPONDENT) DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (APPELLANT) Marg New Delhi AABCH3165P (RESPONDENT) H. T. Media Ltd. Vs DCIT Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (RESPONDENT) AABCH3165P (APPELLANT) DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12101) Hindustan Times House, New D…

M/S. Ht Media Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

ITA 2100/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap & Ms Suchitra Kambledcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) Dcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) H. T. Media Ltd. Vs Dcit Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (Respondent) Aabch3165P (Appellant) Dcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12101) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) Vs Acit Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (Respondent) Aabch3165P (Appellant)

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32

…DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI P. M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (APPELLANT) Marg New Delhi AABCH3165P (RESPONDENT) DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (APPELLANT) Marg New Delhi AABCH3165P (RESPONDENT) H. T. Media Ltd. Vs DCIT Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (RESPONDENT) AABCH3165P (APPELLANT) DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12101) Hindustan Times House, New D…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. H.T. Media Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 6394/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P. M. Jagtap & Ms Suchitra Kambledcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) Dcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) H. T. Media Ltd. Vs Dcit Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (Respondent) Aabch3165P (Appellant) Dcit Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12101) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (Appellant) Marg New Delhi Aabch3165P (Respondent) Vs Acit Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (Respondent) Aabch3165P (Appellant)

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32

…DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI P. M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (APPELLANT) Marg New Delhi AABCH3165P (RESPONDENT) DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12(1) Hindustan Times House, New Delhi 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi (APPELLANT) Marg New Delhi AABCH3165P (RESPONDENT) H. T. Media Ltd. Vs DCIT Hindustan Times House, Circle-12101) 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi New Delhi (RESPONDENT) AABCH3165P (APPELLANT) DCIT Vs H. T. Media Ltd. Circle-12101) Hindustan Times House, New D…

Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 259/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Or During The Course Of Hearing Of The Appeal.” (A) That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Learned Ito & The Cit(A) Erred In : 1) Upholding The Assessment & Addition Of Rs. L,91,945/-U/S 14Ainspite Of The Fact That The Assessment For The Year Had Abated In Terms Of Section 153A & No Incriminating Material Was Unearthed In The Course Of Search & Seizure Operations. 2) Disallowing Rs. 1,91,945/- U/S 14A Of The Act. 3) Disallowing The Expenditure U/S 14A Without The Assessing Officer Giving Any Finding In The Assessment Order Regarding The Amount Of Actual Expenditure Incurred By The Assessee To Earn Tax-Free Income. 4) Not Following The Orders Of The Jurisdictional High Court In This Matter.

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153Section 153A

…DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DCIT Vs Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Central Circle-11 Ltd. New Delhi C-160, Okhla Industries Area, Phase-1, New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT C/o. R. S. Ahuja & co, CA Central Circle-11 C-353, Defence Colony New Delhi New Delhi AAGS7513M (RESPONDENT) (APPELLANT) Appellant by Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT(DR) Respondent by Sh. R. S. Ahuja, CA Date of Hearing 07.06.2018 Date of Pronouncement 11.06.2018 ORDER PER BENCH These two appeals re filed by the Revenue as well as…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 972/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Or During The Course Of Hearing Of The Appeal.” (A) That On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Learned Ito & The Cit(A) Erred In : 1) Upholding The Assessment & Addition Of Rs. L,91,945/-U/S 14Ainspite Of The Fact That The Assessment For The Year Had Abated In Terms Of Section 153A & No Incriminating Material Was Unearthed In The Course Of Search & Seizure Operations. 2) Disallowing Rs. 1,91,945/- U/S 14A Of The Act. 3) Disallowing The Expenditure U/S 14A Without The Assessing Officer Giving Any Finding In The Assessment Order Regarding The Amount Of Actual Expenditure Incurred By The Assessee To Earn Tax-Free Income. 4) Not Following The Orders Of The Jurisdictional High Court In This Matter.

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153Section 153A

…DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DCIT Vs Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Central Circle-11 Ltd. New Delhi C-160, Okhla Industries Area, Phase-1, New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT C/o. R. S. Ahuja & co, CA Central Circle-11 C-353, Defence Colony New Delhi New Delhi AAGS7513M (RESPONDENT) (APPELLANT) Appellant by Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT(DR) Respondent by Sh. R. S. Ahuja, CA Date of Hearing 07.06.2018 Date of Pronouncement 11.06.2018 ORDER PER BENCH These two appeals re filed by the Revenue as well as…

ITO, Chennai vs. Opg Energy (P) Ltd., Chennai

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue and both the cross-objections of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 466/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri M. Balaganeshआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.466/Mds/2017 & C.O. No.50/Mds/2017 (In I.T.A. No.466/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3415/Mds/2016 & C.O. No.16/Mds/2017 (In 3415/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: Shri V. Ravichandran, CA
Section 115JSection 14ASection 8D(2)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एम. बालगणेश, लेखा सद"य केसम" BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.466/Mds/2017 & C.O. No.50/Mds/2017 (in I.T.A. No.466/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3415/Mds/2016 & C.O. No.16/Mds/2017 (in 3415/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, M/s OPG Energy (P) Ltd., Corporate Ward – 5(1), v. No.6, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai - 600 034. Guindy,…

ITO, Chennai vs. Opg Energy Pvt Ltd., Chennai

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue and both the cross-objections of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 3415/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri M. Balaganeshआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.466/Mds/2017 & C.O. No.50/Mds/2017 (In I.T.A. No.466/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3415/Mds/2016 & C.O. No.16/Mds/2017 (In 3415/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: Shri V. Ravichandran, CA
Section 115JSection 14ASection 8D(2)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एम. बालगणेश, लेखा सद"य केसम" BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.466/Mds/2017 & C.O. No.50/Mds/2017 (in I.T.A. No.466/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3415/Mds/2016 & C.O. No.16/Mds/2017 (in 3415/Mds/2016) "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, M/s OPG Energy (P) Ltd., Corporate Ward – 5(1), v. No.6, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai - 600 034. Guindy,…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Cellphone Credit & Securities Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4336/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.D. Agarwal & Shri Kuldip Singhin Ita Nos. 4336, 4337, 4338 & 4339/Del/2015 Assessment Years: 2011-12 Acit Vs. Cellphone Credit & Ecurities Central Circle-26, Room No. Pvt. Ltd. A-60, Naraina Indl. 323, 3Rd Floor, Ara Centre, Area, Phase-1, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi (Applicant) (Respondent) (Pan: Aaacc4101D) Acit Vs. Shyam Basic Infrastructure Central Circle-26, Room No. Project Pvt. Ltd. 323, 3Rd Floor, Ara Centre, A-60, Naraina Indl. Area, Jhandewalan Extn. Phase-1, New Delhi New Delhi (Applicant) (Respondent) (Pan: Aabcs3455R) Acit Vs. Intel Invofin India Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle-26, Room No. A-60, Naraina Indl. Area, 323, 3Rd Floor, Ara Centre, Phase-1, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi (Applicant) (Respondent) (Pan: Aaaci2366J) Acit Vs. A.T. Invofin India Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle-26, Room No. A-60, Naraina Indl. Area, 323, 3Rd Floor, Ara Centre, Phase-1, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi (Applicant) (Respondent) (Pan: Aaaca8248B) Revenue By: Shri U.C. Dubey, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri U.C. Dubey, Sr. DR
Section 14ASection 14A(2)

…ITA Nos. 4436, 4437, 4438 and 4439/Del/2015 Assessment Year: 2011-12 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH “E” BENCH NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGARWAL, PRESIDENT & SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER In ITA Nos. 4336, 4337, 4338 and 4339/Del/2015 Assessment Years: 2011-12 ACIT Vs. Cellphone Credit & ecurities Central Circle-26, Room No. Pvt. Ltd. A-60, Naraina Indl. 323, 3rd Floor, ARA Centre, Area, Phase-1, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi (Applicant) (Respondent) (PAN: AAACC4101D) ACIT Vs. Shyam Basic Infrastructure Central Circle-26, Room No. Project Pvt. Ltd. 323, 3rd Floor, ARA Centre, A-60…