Lime Labs (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO

101 Taxmann.com 201High Court2019#10045 most cited

What is Lime Labs (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO authority for?

A comparable company that employs a different revenue recognition model than the assessee's, or is engaged in product development and earns revenue from sale of licenses and subscriptions, can be excluded on the grounds of functional dissimilarity in transfer pricing.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Lime Labs India Pvt Ltd v ITO · 101 Taxmann.com 201 · Delhi HC 2019 · transfer pricing · comparable company exclusion · functional dissimilarity · revenue recognition · product development · section 92

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Lime Labs (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO

Sas Research and Development (India) Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 6, Pune

In the result, Ground No‟s

ITA 1959/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviphysical Court Of Hearing आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1959/Pun/2018 निर्ाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Sas Research & Development The Asst. Commissioner Of (India) Private Limited, Vs Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune. Level1, 2A & 3, Tower 5, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, Pune – 411 0103 Pan: Aaecs 8099 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Rajendra Agiwal– Ar Revenue By Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav - Dr Date Of Hearing 11/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 19/04/2022 आदेश / Order Per Ss Viswanethra Ravi, Jm : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune Dated 31.10.2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Assessee Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Inappropriate Transfer Pricing Adjustment Even Though The Pricing Of All International Transactions Of The Appellant Was At Arm’S Length Erred On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case & In Law By Making/Confirming Transfer Pricing Adjustment By Rejecting The Analysis Undertaken By The Appellant To Determine Arm‟S Length Price Of Its International Transactions Pertaining To Rendering Of Software Development Support, Consultancy & Training Services To The Aes. 2. Inappropriate Rejection Of The Transfer Pricing Documentation Appropriately Maintained By The Appellant Erred On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case & In Law By Inappropriately Rejecting The Transfer Pricing Documentation Appropriately Maintained By The Appellant & By Inappropriately Conducting A Fresh Search For Benchmarking The Appellant‟S International Transactions.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “सी” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER PHYSICAL COURT OF HEARING आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.1959/PUN/2018 निर्ाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 SAS Research and Development The Asst. Commissioner of (India) Private Limited, Vs Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune. Level1, 2A and 3, Tower 5, Cybercity, Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, Pune – 411 0103 PAN: AAECS 8099 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Rajendra Agiwal– AR Revenue by Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav - DR Date…

Synechron Technologies Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 6, Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1692/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1692/Pun/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Synechron Technologies Private Limited Cedar Building, Ascendas International, Tech Park Pune, Plot No.18, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi, Phase-Iii, Pune-411 057. Pan : Aaics2894R .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri M.P. LohiaFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 144C(5)Section 92C(2)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “सी” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, PUNE (Through Virtual Court) BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA No. 1692/PUN/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Synechron Technologies Private Limited CEDAR Building, Ascendas International, Tech Park Pune, Plot No.18, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjewadi, Phase-III, Pune-411 057. PAN : AAICS2894R .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/s. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6, Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri M.P. Lohia Revenue by : Shr…

M/S Arm Embedded Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer Ward-1(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the assessee appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3374/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleit(Tp)A No.3374/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S.Arm Embedded Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bagmane World Technology Pvt. Ltd., Sez Citrine Block, 5Th & 6Th Floors, Marathahalli, Orr, Doddanakundi Village, Mahadevapura, Bangalore-560 048 ….Appellant Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), Bangalore. ……Respondent. Assessee By: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate. Revenue By: Shri Muzaffar Hussain, Cit (D.R)

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Muzaffar Hussain, CIT (D.R)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “ B ” BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.3374/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/s.ARM Embedded Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bagmane World Technology Pvt. Ltd., SEZ Citrine Block, 5th & 6th Floors, Marathahalli, ORR, Doddanakundi Village, Mahadevapura, Bangalore-560 048 ….Appellant Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), Bangalore. ……Respondent. Assessee By: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocate. Revenue By: Shri Muzaffar Hussain, CIT (D.R) Date of Hearing : 05.08.2020. Date of Prono…

M/S. Fis Solutions (India) Pvt.Ltd, (Fromerly Known As Sungard Solutions India Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 1(2), Pune

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1695/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Mar 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1695/Pun/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Fis Solutions (India) Private Limited. Formerly Known As Sungard Solutions (India) Private Limited. Westend Centre One, Survey No. 169/1, Sector Ii, Aundh, Pune-411 007. Pan : Aaace7476K .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(2), Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Gautam JainFor Respondent: Shri T.V. Bhaskar Reddy, CIT
Section 144C(5)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण “सी” न्यायपीठ पुणे में । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA No. 1695/PUN/2018 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s. FIS Solutions (India) Private Limited. Formerly known as SunGard Solutions (India) Private Limited. Westend Centre One, Survey No. 169/1, Sector II, Aundh, Pune-411 007. PAN : AAACE7476K .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/s. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(2), Pune. ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Gautam Jain Revenue by : Shri T.V. Bhaskar Redd…

Lime Labs (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (101 Taxmann.com 201) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax