KNORR-BREMSE TECHNOLOGY CENTRE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DY. CIT, CIRCLE-14, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the AO/TPO for re-deciding the transfer pricing adjustment after revising the comparable companies' data set. The issue of interest levy under Section 234A was also remanded for re-adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged transfer pricing adjustments made by the TPO and DRP, primarily concerning the selection of comparable companies. The assessee also raised issues regarding the AO's use of an incorrect transfer pricing adjustment amount and the levy of interest.
What were the issues?
The main issues were the selection of comparable companies for transfer pricing, the correct amount of transfer pricing adjustment, and the levy of interest under various sections of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144C,Section 143(3),Section 92CA,Section 154,Section 234A,Section 271(1)(c),Section 274,Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Lime Labs (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO10 citing101 Taxmann.com 201 · 2019 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
per law while complying with the principles of natural justice. Ground No.10 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the combined result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 16th February 2022.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026