Asst.C.I.T., Bangalore vs. Sri. Srinivas Rao Hoskote, Bangalore
In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed
ITA 1154/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Feb 2018AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri. Jason P. Boaz & Shri. Laliet Kumari.T.A Nos.1154 & 1155/Bang/2015 (Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12) Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -2(3)(1), Bengaluru .. Appellant V. Shri. Srinivas Rao Hoskote, No.4/7, 3Rd Floor, Sidda Enclave Nehrunagar, 1St Main Road, Seshadripuram Bengaluru 560 020 .. Respondent Pan : Aaeph8477J Assessee By : Shri. V. Chandrashekar, Advocate Revenue By : Smt. Padmameenakshi, Jcit Heard On : 31.01.2018 Pronounced On : 21.02.2018 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar:
For Appellant: Shri. V. Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Padmameenakshi, JCIT
Section 132Section 133ASection 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 151Section 153Section 153A
…was examining the same in the light of similar facts, as fall for our consideration in the present case. While doing so, the Allahabad High Court placed reliance upon the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Janki Exports International v. Union of India [2005] 278 ITR 296/145 Taxman 82 (Delhi) to hold that the provisions contained in Section 158BD of the Act are analogous to the provisions contained in Section 147 of the Act, insofar as the procedure that is required to be followed. Section 147 contemplates that ITA.1154 & 1155/Bang/2015 Page - 5 if the Assessing Officer has reasons to believe that there is escap…