Asst CIT Cen RG 7, Mumbai vs. Prime Focus Ltd, Mumbai
In the result, the assessee’s cross objection is allowed and the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed
ITA 6203/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2016AY 2005-06
Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Sanjay Arora, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 6203/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) Asst. Cit (Osd)-I, Prime Focus Ltd. Central Range-7, 2, Anand Kunj, North Avenue, बनाम/ Room No. 413, 4Th Floor, Santacruz (W), Mumbai-400 054 Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Marg, Mumbai-400 020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacp 6811 B (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : & ""या"ेप सं./C.O. No. 44/Mum/2016 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 6203/Mum/2014) ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) Prime Focus Ltd. Asst. Cit (Osd)-I, 2, Anand Kunj, North Avenue, Central Range-7, बनाम/ Room No. 413, 4Th Floor, Santacruz (W), Mumbai-400 054 Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Marg, Mumbai-400 020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacp 6811 B (""या"ेपक/Cross Objector) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Premanand J. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Rushabh H. Vyas
For Appellant: Shri Premanand JFor Respondent: Shri Rushabh H. Vyas
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154
…e relevant assessment year. The law in the matter is well settled, even as reliance may be placed on the decision by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Foramer France [2003] 264 ITR 566, 567 (SC), affirming the decision of Foramer vs. CIT [2001] 247 ITR 436, 443 (All). In the present case, apart from the fact that we observe no lapse on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for the computation of its income, and neither has any been pointed to us, the claim has been subject to verification by the A.O. in the original proceedings. Further, though there…