Filatex India Ltd. v. CIT

49 Taxmann.com 465High Court2014#481 most cited

What is Filatex India Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

The Delhi High Court affirms that additions made by the Assessing Officer in assessment proceedings under Section 153A are valid when such additions are based on incriminating material found during a search. The decision did not address the validity of additions in the absence of incriminating material.

195

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Filatex India Ltd. v. CIT · Section 153A · incriminating material · search assessment · additions based on search material · validity of 153A proceedings · Delhi High Court 2014 · undisputed incriminating material · assessment under section 153A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Filatex India Ltd. v. CIT

Shyam Sunder Jindal, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5448/DEL/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Apr 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Ita No. 5448/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Shyam Sunder Jindal, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income 12A, Green Avenue, Sector-D, Tax, Central Circle-30, Pocket-3, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi New Delhi-110070 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aagpj0184N Assessee By : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. & Sh. Rohit Garg, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 16.02.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.04.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 24.08.2016 Of Ld. Cit(A)-30, New Delhi

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B(1)(viii)Section 4

…Smt. Dayawanti Vs CIT 75 Taxmann.com 308 (Del.) 37 Shyam Sunder Jindal " E.N. Gopakumar Vs CIT (2016) 75 Taxmann.com 215 (Ker.) " CIT Vs St. Francis Clay Décor Tiles 385 ITR 624 (Ker.) " CIT Vs Anil Kumar Bhatia 352 ITR 493 (Del.) " Filatex India Ltd. Vs CIT 49 Taxmann.com 465 (Del.) 18. It was further submitted that the addition had been made by the AO on the basis of statement on oath of the assessee recorded during the course of search on 14.11.2011 u/s 132(4) of the Act. It was also submitted that the assessee did not inform about his bank account for the period November 2005 to February 2007, copy of which…