DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma

159 Taxmann.com 179High Court2024#297 most cited

What is DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma authority for?

Loose sheets of paper containing jottings, not shown to be part of regularly maintained books of accounts, do not constitute incriminating material for initiating assessment under section 153C. The satisfaction note required for 153C proceedings must specify the assessment year to which the alleged incriminating material belongs.

269

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma · section 153C · incriminating material · loose jottings · books of account · satisfaction note · assessment year specific · search and seizure assessment · section 132 · Karnataka High Court · Supreme Court approval

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma