Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Spectrum Consultants P. Ltd.

2 ITR-OL 622Reported decision2014#371 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Spectrum Consultants P. Ltd. authority for?

Contributions received from employees towards ESI are deductible as business expenditure, even if paid after the due date for payment but before the due date for filing the return of income.

237

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2023.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Spectrum Consultants India P. Ltd · Spectrum Consultants India · ESI contribution · employee contribution · deduction · due date · section 36(1)(va) · section 43B · Income Tax Act

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Spectrum Consultants P. Ltd.

M/S. Enphase Solar Energy Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 723/BANG/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2019-20 M/S. Enphase Solar Energy Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Director Of Income 259, 2Nd Main, 6Th Cross, 2Nd Floor, Tax, Indiranagar, Stage 1, Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru – 560 038. Bengaluru. Pan : Aaece 7259 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Suresh Muthukrishnan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 08.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan:

For Appellant: Shri. Suresh Muthukrishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(a)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2019-20 M/s. Enphase Solar Energy Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Director of Income 259, 2nd Main, 6th Cross, 2nd Floor, Tax, Indiranagar, Stage 1, Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru – 560 038. Bengaluru. PAN : AAECE 7259 C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Suresh Muthukrishnan, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 08.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 08.02.2022 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudev…

Arctern Consulting Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 352/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri B. R. Baskaranit(Tp)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Embassy Tech Village, Income-Tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5Th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. Pan : Aaeca 9113 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, Cit-Dr(Itat)(Bengaluru) Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru)
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 92

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.352/Bang/2017 Assessment year : 2012-13 M/s. Arctern Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Embassy Tech Village, Income-tax, Tower 2B Hibiscus, 5th Floor, Circle – 1(1)(2), Deverabeesanahalli, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 037. PAN : AAECA 9113 F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR(ITAT)(Bengaluru) Date of hearing : 09.10.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 15.10.2019 O R D E R Per N.…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-5(1)(1), Bangalore vs. M/S Network Detective Agency Pvt Ltd, Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2044/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. A. K. Garodia & Shri. Laliet Kumari.T.A No.2044/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year : 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle -5(1)(1), Bengaluru .. Appellant V. M/S. Network Detective Agency P. Ltd. No.69/1, Kuvempu Nagar, 35Th Main, 7Th Cross, Btm Layout, 2Nd Stage, Bengaluru 560058 .. Respondent Pan : Aaccn3772D Assessee By : Shri. S. Srinivasan, Ca Revenue By : Shri. R. N. Siddappaji, Addl. Cit Heard On : 28.02.2019 Pronounced On : 28.02.2019 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar:

For Appellant: Shri. S. Srinivasan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. N. Siddappaji, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…tomers Dialog P. Ltd [(2015) 371 ITR 242 – Kar], which reads as under ; 3. This court had an occasion to consider the said question of law in the case of CIT v. Spectrum Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. decided on December 9, 2013 in W. A. No. 4077 of 2013 [2014] 2 ITR-OL 622 (Karn) where, after referring to sections 29, 30 and 31 of the Provident Fund Act, has held as under (page 626 of 2 ITR-OL) : "A reading of the aforesaid provisions makes it clear that the contributions payable by the employer under the scheme shall be at the rate of 10 per cent. of the basic wages, dearness allowance. The contribution payable b…