No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015
PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR
ITA No.116/2015
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -11(1) RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001.
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADV)
AND:
M/s.ADDECCO FLEXIONE WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., (NOW ADDECCO INDIA PVT. LTD.,)
NO.2, SAI DEEP SHRINIDHI NAL WIND TUNNEL ROAD MURUGESHPALYA, BANGALORE PAN : AABCG 3636Q
.. RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.10.2014 PASSED IN ITA No.1238/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1238/BANG/2013 DATED 28.10.2014 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), BANGALORE.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN,, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants states that the two questions of law raised within appeal are covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commisisoner of Income Tax –vs- Spectrum Consultants India (P) Ltd., reported in (2014) 266 CTR 241 (Kar.). In the said case, the questions have been answered in favour of assessee and against the Revenue.
As such, for the reasons given in the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Spectrum Consultants India (P) Ltd., this appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Bkm