Commissioner of Income Tax v. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd.

Veetee Fine Foods Limited, Sonepat vs. ITO, Ward-26(1), Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…ng the provisions of section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). 1.1 This challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only.The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: AY 2011-12:…

Cube Highways and Transportation Assets Advisors Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 6(1) Delhi, C.R. Building, Delhi, New Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…2/D/24, 1103/D/17,600/D/21 with SA 225/D/25, ITAS 4325/D/24,5747/D/24, 5319/D/24, 5735/D/24 & 5820/D/24 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Jsw Mg Motor India Private Limited (Formerly Known As Mg Motor India Private Limited), Gurgaon, Haryana vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, New Delhi

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.5268/दिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2020-21) Jsw Mg Motor India P. Ltd.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण दिल्ली पीठ "आई", दिल्ली श्री विकास अवस्थी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री संजय अवस्थी, लेखाकार सदस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH "I", DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.5268/दिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2020-21) JSW MG Motor India P. Ltd., ITA No. 5268/Del/2024(A.Y 2020-21) (formerly known as MG Motor India P. Ltd.) 10th floor, Milestone Experion Centre Sector-15, Part-II, Gurgaon, Haryana 121001 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AAKCM-8110-E बनाम Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Center Circle 4, New Delhi प्रतिवादी/Re…

Lx Pantos India Private Limited, Delhi vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1), Delhi

…idering the provisions of section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). This challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: - 1. AY 2021…

Mcdonalds India Private Limited, Delhi vs. ACIT Or DCIT, C.R. Building, Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…2/D/24, 1103/D/17,600/D/21 with SA 225/D/25, ITAS 4325/D/24,5747/D/24, 5319/D/24, 5735/D/24 & 5820/D/24 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Incedo Technology Solutions Limited, Delhi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Microsoft Corporation (India) P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle 16(1), New Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6031/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 Munjal Hospitality Private Limited, Um House, Plot No.35, 3Rd Floor, Tower A, Sector-44, Dlf Qe, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. Pan No.Aaccv4293M अपीलार्थी Appellant बनाम The Assessing Officer, Vs. National Faceless Assessee By Shri Jeet Kamdar, Ar (Virtual) Assessment Centre, Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr Circle-17(1), C.R. Building, Delhi. प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.3897/Del/2019 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2009-10 Zte Telecom India Pvt. Limited, Tower-10B, 6Th Floor, Dlf Cyber City, Phase-Ii, Gurgaon, Haryana. बनाम Acit, Vs. Circle-4(1), Hsiidc Building, Udyog Vihar, Phase-05, Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No.Aaacz1958K अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ankit Sahni, Adv. & Ms. Taranjeet Kaur, Ar Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.3922/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Incedo Technology Solutions Limited बनाम Dcit, A-47, Lower Ground Floor, Hauz Khas, Delhi. Vs. Circle 10(1), Delhi. Pan No.Aacci6243C अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Rohit Tiwar, Adv. & Ms. Tanya, Advocate Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr 1

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products Private Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-16(1), Dehi

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.725/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2017-18) Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products P. Ltd., 1400 Modi Tower, 98 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacm-5901-B बिाम Vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assisant Commissioner Of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Delhi आअसं.672/धिल्ली/2021(नि.व. 2016-17) Le Passage Tours & Travels India P. Ltd., A-296, Basement, Conference Cabin, Shivalik, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi 110017 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacl-8370-K बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 13(1), Cr Building, New Delhi 110002 आअसं.2071/धिल्ली/2017(नि.व. 2012-13) Eberspaecher Suetrak Bus Climate Control Systems India P. Ltd., No.2/1, Soukya Road, Thirumalashettyhally, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560067 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aacce-3922-E बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 8(1), Cr Building New Delhi

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.725/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2017-18) Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products P. Ltd., 1400 Modi Tower, 98 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AAACM-5901-B बिाम Vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assisant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Delhi आअसं.672/धिल्ली/2021…

Smart Cube India Private Limited, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-22(2), New Delhi

In the result, all ITA Nos

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.1939/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 बनाम Corteva Agriscience India Pvt. Ltd., Dct, 17Th Floor, Tower-C, Dlf Cyber Greens, Vs. Circle 4(2), Sector 25A, Phase-3, Gurgaon, Haryana. C.R. Building, New Delhi. Pan No.Aaace2462M अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…2021 involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through a single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Good Year India Ltd, Haryana vs. ACIT (OSD) Circle 10(1), C.R.Building, New Delhi

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Corteva Agriscience India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Circle- 4(2), New Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No. 1939/Del/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 Corteva Agriscience India Pvt. Ltd., 17Th Floor, Tower-C, Dlf Cyber Greens, Sector 25A, Phase-3, Gurgaon, Haryana. Pan No.Aaace2462M बनाम Dct, Vs. Circle 4(2), C.R. Building, New Delhi. अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocate & Ms. Ashmita Sharma, Advocate (Virtual) Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5939/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 Persolkelly Inda Private Limited, Unit No.1202, 1203 & 1204, 12Th Floor, Tower-C, Unitech Cyber Park, Sector-29, Haryana. Pan No.Aabck6665K बनाम Dcit, Vs. Circle-19(1), C.R. Building, New Delhi. अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ankit Sahni, Advocate & Ms. Taranjeet Kaur, Ar Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr 1

…l/2021 involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through a single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Vedanta Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle, 25 (1), New Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Philip Morris Services India Sarl, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-2(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.1603 & 1604/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2009-10 & 2010-11)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.1603 & 1604/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2009-10 & 2010-11) ITA Nos. 1603 & 1604/Del/2022(A.Ys 2009-10 & 2010-11) Philip Morris Services India SARL, Unit No. 20, Ground Floor, Plot No.D-1, Salcon Rasvilas, Saket District Centre, Saket, New Delhi 110017 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AACCP-2770-K बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(2), I…

Philip Morris Services India Sarl, New Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-2(2)(2), International Taxation

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.1603 & 1604/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2009-10 & 2010-11)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.1603 & 1604/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2009-10 & 2010-11) ITA Nos. 1603 & 1604/Del/2022(A.Ys 2009-10 & 2010-11) Philip Morris Services India SARL, Unit No. 20, Ground Floor, Plot No.D-1, Salcon Rasvilas, Saket District Centre, Saket, New Delhi 110017 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AACCP-2770-K बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(2)(2), I…

Ikea India P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-10(1), New Delhi

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Le Passage to India Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle- 13(1), New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.725/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2017-18) Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products P. Ltd., 1400 Modi Tower, 98 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacm-5901-B बिाम Vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assisant Commissioner Of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Delhi आअसं.672/धिल्ली/2021(नि.व. 2016-17) Le Passage Tours & Travels India P. Ltd., A-296, Basement, Conference Cabin, Shivalik, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi 110017 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacl-8370-K बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 13(1), Cr Building, New Delhi 110002 आअसं.2071/धिल्ली/2017(नि.व. 2012-13) Eberspaecher Suetrak Bus Climate Control Systems India P. Ltd., No.2/1, Soukya Road, Thirumalashettyhally, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560067 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aacce-3922-E बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 8(1), Cr Building New Delhi

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.725/धिल्ली/2022(नि.व. 2017-18) Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products P. Ltd., 1400 Modi Tower, 98 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AAACM-5901-B बिाम Vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assisant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Delhi आअसं.672/धिल्ली/2021…

Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Limited (As Successor - in - Interest of Erstwhile Aricent Technologies Private Limited), New Delhi vs. Neac, New Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…2/D/24, 1103/D/17,600/D/21 with SA 225/D/25, ITAS 4325/D/24,5747/D/24, 5319/D/24, 5735/D/24 & 5820/D/24 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Evalueserve.Com Pvt. Ltd., Gurgain vs. ACIT Circle-9(2), New Delhi

In the result, all ITA Nos

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5982/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Mmtc-Pamp India Private Limited, Dcit, 221, Ground Floor, Okhla Industrial Estate, Vs. Circle-16(1),C.R. Building, Phase-Iii, New Delhi. Indraprastha Marg, Pan No.Aafcm3576K I.P. Estate, New Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Qualcomm India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

…ppeals involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through a single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

ACIT Circle-26(2), New Delhi vs. Veetee Fine Foods Ltd., New Delhi

…ing the provisions of section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). 1.1 This challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only.The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: AY 2011-12: T…