Commissioner of Income Tax v. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd.

Mori Seiki India Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. DCIT/ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.5461/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd., Unit No. 3, 10Th Floor Ambience Corporate, Tower-Ii, Nh-8 Plot No. 3 Ambience Island, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaecp-8368-H बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 आअसं.5951/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Mitsui & Co India P. Ltd., 4Th Floor, Worldmark 3, Asset 7, Aero City, Nh-8, New Delhi 110037 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aadcm-4488-J बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 16(1), Cr Building, Delhi 110002 आअसं.5999/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Rohde & Sehwarz India P. Ltd., A-27, First Floor, Mohan Corporate, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110044 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacr-3267-P बिाम Vs. Assessment Unit/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 19(1), Cr Building, Ip Estate, New Delhi 110002 ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.5461/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd., Unit No. 3, 10th Floor Ambience Corporate, Tower-II, NH-8 Plot No. 3 Ambience Island, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AAECP-8368-H बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 आअसं.5951/धिल्ली/…

Mitsui & Co India Private Limited, New Delhi vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.5461/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd., Unit No. 3, 10Th Floor Ambience Corporate, Tower-Ii, Nh-8 Plot No. 3 Ambience Island, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaecp-8368-H बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 आअसं.5951/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Mitsui & Co India P. Ltd., 4Th Floor, Worldmark 3, Asset 7, Aero City, Nh-8, New Delhi 110037 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aadcm-4488-J बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 16(1), Cr Building, Delhi 110002 आअसं.5999/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Rohde & Sehwarz India P. Ltd., A-27, First Floor, Mohan Corporate, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110044 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacr-3267-P बिाम Vs. Assessment Unit/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 19(1), Cr Building, Ip Estate, New Delhi 110002 ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.5461/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd., Unit No. 3, 10th Floor Ambience Corporate, Tower-II, NH-8 Plot No. 3 Ambience Island, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AAECP-8368-H बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 आअसं.5951/धिल्ली/…

Jubilant Pharmova Limited, Uttar Pradesh vs. DCIT/ACIT (Central), Moradabad

In the result, all two appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.1970/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 बनाम Jubilant Pharmova Ltd., Acit-1, Plot-1A, Sector-16A, District G.B. Vs. Moradabad-New, Nagar, Noida,Uttar Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aabcv0200H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5713/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Jubilant Pharmova Ltd., Dcit/Acit (Central), Bhartiagram Gajraula, Vs. Income Tax Department, Plot-1A, Sector-16A,District G.B. Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh. Nagar, Noida,Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aabcv0200H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…f section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). This challenge to the validity of the JUBILANT PHARMOVA LTD. impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only.The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: - 1. AY 2018…

Jubilant Foodworks Limited, Noida vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida

…idering the provisions of section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as "the Act"). This challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: - i. AY 2020…

Jinfei Trading India Pvt Ltd, Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Circle - 13(1), Delhi

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.2 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act areapplicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Fujitsu Consulting India Private Limited, Delhi vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, New Delhi

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.2 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.). Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act areapplicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Airbnb Payments India Private Limited, Gurugram vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1), Gurugram, Haryana

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5517/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Airbnb Payments India Private Limited, The Dcit Circle 1(1), Level 9, Spaze I Tech Park, A1 Tower,Sector Vs. Gurugram,Haryana. 49, Sohna Road, Gurugram, Haryana.India. Pan No. Aanca6203B अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.2 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act areapplicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Pioneer India Electronics Private Limited, Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Circle 3(1), Gurgaon/ Assessment Unit/Income Tax Department, Gurgaon

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआअसं.5461/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd., Unit No. 3, 10Th Floor Ambience Corporate, Tower-Ii, Nh-8 Plot No. 3 Ambience Island, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaecp-8368-H बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 आअसं.5951/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Mitsui & Co India P. Ltd., 4Th Floor, Worldmark 3, Asset 7, Aero City, Nh-8, New Delhi 110037 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aadcm-4488-J बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 16(1), Cr Building, Delhi 110002 आअसं.5999/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Rohde & Sehwarz India P. Ltd., A-27, First Floor, Mohan Corporate, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110044 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant Pan: Aaacr-3267-P बिाम Vs. Assessment Unit/Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 19(1), Cr Building, Ip Estate, New Delhi 110002 ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण धिल्ली पीठ “आई”, धिल्ली श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य एिं श्री संजय अिस्थी, लेखाकार सिस्य के समक्ष IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”, DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं.5461/धिल्ली/2024(नि.व. 2021-22) Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd., Unit No. 3, 10th Floor Ambience Corporate, Tower-II, NH-8 Plot No. 3 Ambience Island, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 ...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant PAN: AAECP-8368-H बिाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, ..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana 122001 आअसं.5951/धिल्ली/…

Jubilant Foodworks Limited, Noida vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida

In the result, all two appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4339/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 बनाम Jubilant Foodworks Limited, Deputy Commissioner Of Plot No.1A, Sector-16A, Noida,Gautam Vs. Income Tax, Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. Circle-5(1)(1), Noida, Pan No.Aabcd1821C Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5712/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Jubilant Foodworks Limited, Assistant Commissioner Of Plot No.1A, Sector-16A, Noida, Vs. Income Tax, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. Circle 5(1)(1), Noida, Pan No.Aabcd1821C Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). This challenge to the validity of the JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD. impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only.The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: - i. AY 2020…

Haskoningdhv Consulting Pvt Ltd, Delhi vs. ACIT, Circle-10(1), Delhi

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5517/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Airbnb Payments India Private Limited, The Dcit Circle 1(1), Level 9, Spaze I Tech Park, A1 Tower,Sector Vs. Gurugram,Haryana. 49, Sohna Road, Gurugram, Haryana.India. Pan No. Aanca6203B अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.2 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act areapplicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Jubilant Pharmova Ltd, Noida vs. ACIT-1Moradabad New, Utter Pradesh

In the result, all two appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.1970/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 बनाम Jubilant Pharmova Ltd., Acit-1, Plot-1A, Sector-16A, District G.B. Vs. Moradabad-New, Nagar, Noida,Uttar Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aabcv0200H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5713/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Jubilant Pharmova Ltd., Dcit/Acit (Central), Bhartiagram Gajraula, Vs. Income Tax Department, Plot-1A, Sector-16A,District G.B. Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh. Nagar, Noida,Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aabcv0200H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…f section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). This challenge to the validity of the JUBILANT PHARMOVA LTD. impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only.The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: - 1. AY 2018…

Yanmar Agricultural Machinery India Private Limited (Formerly Known As Claas India Private Limited), New Delhi vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle 4(2), New Delhi

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Munjal Hospitality Private Limited, Gugaon vs. DCIT, Circle 17(1), Delhi

In the result, all appeals as per ITA Nos

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6031/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Munjal Hospitality Private Limited, The Assessing Officer, Um House, Plot No.35, Vs. National Faceless 3Rd Floor, Tower A, Sector-44, Assessment Centre, Dlf Qe, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. Circle-17(1), Pan No.Aaccv4293M C.R. Building, Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Escorts Kubota Limited (Escorts Kubota India Private Limited Merged With Escorts Kubota Limited), Faridabad vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5982/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 Mmtc-Pamp India Private Limited, 221, Ground Floor, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase-Iii, New Delhi. बनाम Dcit, Vs. Circle-16(1),C.R. Building, Indraprastha Marg, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. Pan No.Aafcm3576K अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Ms. Sherry Goyal, Adv. & Ms. Viyushti Rawat, Adv. Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No. 1994/Del/2022 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Good Year India Ltd., Mathura Road, Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana. बनाम Acit (Osd), Vs. Circle 10(1), C.R. Building, New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacg3511H अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv., Shri Ramit Katyal, Ar Shri Dhruv Seth, Adv. & Ms. Mansha Bhalla, Ar Revenue By Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr Bergen Engines (India) Private Limited, बनाम आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5991/Del/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22 2Nd Floor, 52B, Okhla Industrial Estate, Dcit, Vs. Circle-4(2), C.R. Building, Phase-Iii, New Delhi. I.P. Estate, Delhi. Pan No.Aaecb7223M अपीलार्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ankit Sahni, Adv., Ms. Taranjeet Kaur, Ar & Revenue By Shri Vishal Kalra, Adv. (Virtual) Shri Dharm Veer Singh, Cit Dr

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Bergen Engines (India) Private Limited, New Delhi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi

…als involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assessee…

Mmtc-Pamp India Private Limited, New Delhi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 16(1), New Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…ls involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through this single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Persolkelly India Private Limited, Gurgaon vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 19(1), Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…eals involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through a single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Lx Pantos India Private Limited, Delhi vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1), Delhi

In the result, all two appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5913/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Lx Pantos India Private Limited, The Deputy Commissioner Of K-27, Ground Floor, Gali No.6, Vs. Income Tax, K Block, Labour Chowk, Circle 13(1), Mahipalpur, South West Delhi. C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, Pan No.Aaacf8539L Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

…idering the provisions of section 144C(13) r.w.s. 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”). This challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only.The specific grounds raised by the assessee are as under: - 1. AY 2021…

Aapc India Hotel Management Private Limited, Delhi vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (Jurisdictional Assessing Officer- DCIT/ACIT, Circle 1(1)), Delhi

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…2/D/24, 1103/D/17,600/D/21 with SA 225/D/25, ITAS 4325/D/24,5747/D/24, 5319/D/24, 5735/D/24 & 5820/D/24 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…

Osg Minerals Pvt Ltd, Uttar Pradesh vs. Assessment Unit, DCIT, Circle -5(2)(1), Noida

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthi

…eals involve the common issue of limitation, hence, they are being disposed of through a single order. 1.1 The challenge to the validity of the impugned order arises from the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd. reported in 445 ITR 537 (Mad.), Sections 144C and 153 are mutually inclusive and not mutually exclusive as both contain provisions relating to section 92CA and are interdependent and overlapping and hence, period of limitation prescribed under section 153(2A) or 153(3) of the Act are applicable only. The specific grounds, challenging the limitation raised by the assesse…