CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd.

171 Taxmann 156High Court2008#193 most cited

What is CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd. authority for?

The assessment order must clearly specify the reason for initiating penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and explicitly state whether it is for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Failure to identify the specific limb under which penalty is initiated renders the penalty unsustainable.

384

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,514 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Virgo Marketing · Section 271(1)(c) · initiation of penalty proceedings · assessment order · specific charge · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · levy of penalty · Section 274 · Section 270A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd.

Model Fuels Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward - 3(3), Kolkata

Appeal is allowed

ITA 382/KOL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Dec 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year: 2010-11 Model Fuels Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Officer, बनाम C/O Rsvpc & Company, Ward-3(3), P-7, / 41A, A.J.C.Bose Road, V/S. Chowringhee Square, Suite No.613, 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Kolkata-700 017 Kolkata-69 [Pan No.Aabcm 8951 E] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Lokesh Mishra, Ar अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri S.Haldar, Sr-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 19-12-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 26-12-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2010-11 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kolkata’S Order Dated 29.01.2018 Passed In Case No.Itba/Appeal_1/2017-18/1007753670(1), Involving Proceedings 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Both The Parties. Case File(S) Perused. 2. The Assessee’S Sole Substantive Grievance Raised In The Instant Appeal Challenges Correctness Of Both The Lower Authorities Action Imposing The Penalty In Issue Of ₹3,13,571/- U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act. It Emerges From The Relevant Penalty Notice Dated 28.03.2013 That The Assessing Officer Did Not Specify As To Whether The Assessee Is Accused Of Concealment Of Particulars Of Any Taxable Income Or It Had

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अधीकरण, "यायपीठ – “D” कोलकाता, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA Before Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member and Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2010-11 Model Fuels Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax Officer, बनाम C/o RSVPC & Company, Ward-3(3), P-7, / 41A, A.J.C.Bose Road, V/s. Chowringhee Square, Suite No.613, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, Kolkata-700 017 Kolkata-69 [PAN No.AABCM 8951 E] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Lokesh Mishra, AR अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri S.Haldar, Sr-DR ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 19-12-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of…