CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd.

171 Taxmann 156High Court2008#193 most cited

What is CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd. authority for?

The assessment order must clearly specify the reason for initiating penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and explicitly state whether it is for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Failure to identify the specific limb under which penalty is initiated renders the penalty unsustainable.

384

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,514 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Virgo Marketing · Section 271(1)(c) · initiation of penalty proceedings · assessment order · specific charge · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · levy of penalty · Section 274 · Section 270A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd.

Chitralekha, Mumbai vs. A.C.I.T.- 17(1), Mumbai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 6849/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.6849/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2010-11) M/S. Chitralekha Asstt. Commissioner Of 25, Andheri Industrial Estate Income Tax -17(1) बनाम/ Near Janki Centre Room No.117 Vs. Off Veera Desai Road Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 053 Mumbai-400 020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaafc-1152-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Appellant By : Ms. Aarti Vissanji-Ld.Ar Respondent By : Abhi Ram Kartikeyan - Ld.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 14/03/2019 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 19/03/2019 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Ms. Aarti Vissanji-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Abhi Ram Kartikeyan - Ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 36(1)(iii)

…1 Chitralekha Assessment Year :2010-11 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “सी” "ायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, "ाियक सद" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.6849/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2010-11) M/s. Chitralekha Asstt. Commissioner of 25, Andheri Industrial Estate Income Tax -17(1) बनाम/ Near Janki Centre Room No.117 Vs. Off Veera Desai Road Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 053 Mumbai-400 020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN…

M/S Stump Schuele and Somappa Springs Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Ltu Circle-1, Bangalore

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13

ITA 1604/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Stumpp Schuele & Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Somappa Springs Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Ltu, No.139/2, Hosur Road, Circle - 1, Koramangala, Bengaluru. Bengaluru-560 095. Pan : Aalcs 7347 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Sowmya, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. M. Rajasekhar, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 14.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.03.2019 O R D E R Per Jason P. Boazthis Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Cit(A)-10, Bangalore, Dated 01.02.2018 For Assessment Year 2012-13, Upholding The Levy Of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Briefly Stated, The Facts Relevant For Disposal Of This Appeal Are As Under: Page 2 Of 9 2.1 The Assessee, A Company Engaged In The Manufacture & Supply Of Stabilizer Bars & All Varieties Of Springs, Automobile Components, Spare Parts, Accessories, Etc., Filed Its Return Of Income For Assessment Year 2012-13 On 30.09.2012 Declaring Loss Of (-) Rs.5,34,42,031/- Under Normal Provisions & ‘Book Profits’ Of Rs.2,88,52,729/- Under Section 115Jb Of The Act. The Case Was Taken Up For Assessment For This Assessment Year & The Assessment Was Concluded Under Section 143(3) Of The Act Vide Order Dated 13.03.2015, Wherein The Assessee’S Loss Was Determined At Rs.4,55,68,066/- In View Of The Following Additions / Deductions:- (I) Disallowance Of Deduction Under Section 35(2Ab) – Rs.14,34,982/- (Ii) Disallowance Of Leave Encashment – Rs.64,38,983/-.

For Appellant: Smt. Sowmya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. M. Rajasekhar, Addl. CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 35

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI JASON P. BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment year : 2012-13 M/s. Stumpp Schuele and Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Somappa Springs Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, LTU, No.139/2, Hosur Road, Circle - 1, Koramangala, Bengaluru. Bengaluru-560 095. PAN : AALCS 7347 E APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Smt. Sowmya, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. M. Rajasekhar, Addl. CIT Date of hearing : 14.03.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 15.03.2019 O R D E R Per Jason P. Boaz, Accountant Member This appeal by the assessee is direct…

Sri Rakesh Singh, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-6(3)(1), Bangalore

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1478/BANG/2018[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Mar 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri. J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri. Laliet Kumari.T.A Nos.1478 & 1479/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year : 2001-02 & 2004-05) Sri Rakesh Singh, L/R Of Late Sri Lakhan Singh, No.2, 4Th Floor, R. R. Chambers, Vasanthanagar, Bengaluru .. Appellant Pan : Ardps8589G V. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle – 6 (3), Bengaluru .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri. V. Srinivasan, Advocate Revenue By : Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. Cit Heard On : 04.03.2019 Pronounced On : 04.03.2019 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar: The Present Two Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against Separate Orders Passed By The Cit (A) Dt.15.02.2018, For The Assessment Years 2001-02 & 2004-05 Respectively, Involving A Common Issue With Regard To Levy Of Penalty U/S.271(1)(C) , Which Was Confirmed By The Cit (A).

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…ITA.1478 & 1479/Bang/2018 page - 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH 'C', BENGALURU BEFORE SHRI. J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A Nos.1478 & 1479/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year : 2001-02 & 2004-05) Sri Rakesh Singh, l/R of late Sri lakhan Singh, No.2, 4th floor, R. R. Chambers, Vasanthanagar, Bengaluru .. Appellant PAN : ARDPS8589G v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 6 (3), Bengaluru .. Respondent Assessee by : Shri. V. Srinivasan, Advocate Revenue by : Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT Heard on : 04.03.2019 Pronounced on : 04.03.2019…