CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

73 Taxmann.com 241High Court2016#64 most cited

What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?

A penalty notice under section 271(1)(c) read with section 274 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty is for concealment of income or for furnishing incorrect particulars of income.

791

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,164 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. SSA's Emerald Meadows · section 271(1)(c) · section 274 · penalty notice · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · defective notice · vitiates penalty proceedings · Karnataka High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kanpur vs. Smt. Shehla Ahmed, Kanpur

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 181/LKW/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow22 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2013-14 Dy. Cit-1 V. Smt. Shehla Ahmad Kanpur 376-C, Allied Street Jajmau, Kanpur Tan/Pan:Aexpa4122N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.09/Lkw/2018 [In Ita No.181/Lkw/2018] Assessment Year: 2013-14 Smt. Shehla Ahmad V. Dy. Cit-1 376-C, Allied Street Kanpur Jajmau, Kanpur Tan/Pan:Aexpa4122N (Cross-Objector) (Respondent) Department By: Shri R. K. Vishvakarma, D.R. Assessee By: Shri Swarn Singh, Fca Date Of Hearing: 24 07 2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 22 08 2019 O R D E R Per A. D. Jain, V.P.: This Is Revenue’S Appeal & Assessee’S Cross Objection Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-Ii, Kanpur, Dated 1/12/2017, For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Revenue Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-Ii, Kanpur Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Deleting The Penalty Of Rs.22,00,000/- Imposed By The Assessing Officer On Account Of Undisclosed

For Appellant: Shri Swarn Singh, FCAFor Respondent: Shri R. K. Vishvakarma, D.R
Section 10(38)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 40a

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “B”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dy. CIT-1 v. Smt. Shehla Ahmad Kanpur 376-C, Allied Street Jajmau, Kanpur TAN/PAN:AEXPA4122N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.09/LKW/2018 [In ITA No.181/LKW/2018] Assessment Year: 2013-14 Smt. Shehla Ahmad v. Dy. CIT-1 376-C, Allied Street Kanpur Jajmau, Kanpur TAN/PAN:AEXPA4122N (Cross-Objector) (Respondent) Department by: Shri R. K. Vishvakarma, D.R. Assessee by: Shri Swarn Singh, FCA Date of hearing: 24 07 2019 Date of pronouncement: 22 08 201…

Balbir Singh (HUF), Chandigarh vs. DCIT, C-1(1), Chandigarh

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1661/CHANDI/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Aug 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt.Diva Singh & Smt.Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1661/Chd/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05

For Appellant: Shri B.M.Monga, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Hemant Gupta, Sr.DR
Section 2Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए”, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’, CHANDIGARH "ीमती "दवा "संह, "याय"क सद"य एवं "ीमती अ"नपूणा" गु"ता, लेखा सद"य BEFORE SMT.DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.1661/Chd/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 M/s Balbir Singh (HUF), The D.C.I.T., बनाम Prop.M/s Sohi Banquet Hall, Circle-1(1), H.No.10, Sector 3, Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AADHB4674A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by: Shri B.M.Monga, Adv. & Shri Rohit Kaura, Adv. राज…