CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

73 Taxmann.com 241High Court2016#64 most cited

What is CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows authority for?

A penalty notice under section 271(1)(c) read with section 274 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty is for concealment of income or for furnishing incorrect particulars of income.

791

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. SSA's Emerald Meadows · section 271(1)(c) · section 274 · penalty notice · concealment of income · furnishing inaccurate particulars · defective notice · vitiates penalty proceedings · Karnataka High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows

Enefpy Fashions P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle-8(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 7647/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2014-15 Enefpy Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, F-29, Top Floor, Okhla Industrial Area, Circle-8(1), Phase-I, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aadcp5697A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sunil Arora, Ca Revenue By : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.09.2019 Order This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 4Th September, 2018 Of The Cit(A)-3, New Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Levy Of Penalty Of Rs.4,33,050/- U/S 271(1)(C) Of The It Act By The Assessing Officer Which Has Been Partially Reduced By The Cit(A) Is The Only Issue Raised By The Assessee In The Grounds Of Appeal.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 40A(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 Enefpy Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Vs. DCIT, F-29, Top Floor, Okhla Industrial Area, Circle-8(1), Phase-I, New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN: AADCP5697A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sunil Arora, CA Revenue by : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 05.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 24.09.2019 ORDER This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 4th September, 2018 of the CIT(A)-3, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Levy of penalty of Rs.4,33,…