CIT v. Shelly Products

261 ITR 367Supreme Court of India2003#623 most cited

What is CIT v. Shelly Products authority for?

An assessee is not estopped from making a legitimate claim, even if it was erroneously or inadvertently not made in the original return of income, as the purpose of assessment is to correctly determine the tax liability in accordance with law through a justice-oriented approach.

158

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,421 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Shelly Products · 261 ITR 367 · legitimate claim · erroneous claim · inadvertent claim · estoppel · return of income · correct tax liability · assessment procedure · justice-oriented approach

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Shelly Products

ITO 5(3)(3), Mumbai vs. Tesla Technologies and Oxidation P.Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3664/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.2134/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/S Tesla Technologies & Vs. Acit-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.1789/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) Acit-5(3), Mumbai Vs. M/S Tesla Technologies & Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja Pawar याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Capt. Pradeep Arya सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/09/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 18/11/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja PawarFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ ‘ई’, म ुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.2134/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/s Tesla Technologies & Vs. ACIT-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AABCT 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.1789/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) ACIT-5(3), Mu…

Tesla Technologies & Oxida P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 5(3)(3), Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3571/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.2134/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/S Tesla Technologies & Vs. Acit-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.1789/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) Acit-5(3), Mumbai Vs. M/S Tesla Technologies & Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja Pawar याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Capt. Pradeep Arya सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/09/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 18/11/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja PawarFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ ‘ई’, म ुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.2134/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/s Tesla Technologies & Vs. ACIT-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AABCT 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.1789/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) ACIT-5(3), Mu…

Tesla Technologies & Oxidation P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 5(3), Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2134/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.2134/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/S Tesla Technologies & Vs. Acit-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.1789/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) Acit-5(3), Mumbai Vs. M/S Tesla Technologies & Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja Pawar याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Capt. Pradeep Arya सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/09/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 18/11/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja PawarFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ ‘ई’, म ुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.2134/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/s Tesla Technologies & Vs. ACIT-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AABCT 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.1789/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) ACIT-5(3), Mu…

DCIT 5(3), Mumbai vs. Tesla Technolgies & Oxidation P.Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1789/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Nov 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.2134/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/S Tesla Technologies & Vs. Acit-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.1789/Mum/2013 & Ita No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) Acit-5(3), Mumbai Vs. M/S Tesla Technologies & Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabct 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja Pawar याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Capt. Pradeep Arya सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 21/09/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 18/11/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per R.C.Sharma (A.M): These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2009-2010 & 2010-2011, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) Of The I.T. Act.

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Tiwari & Rutuja PawarFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ ‘ई’, म ुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.2134/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3571/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) M/s Tesla Technologies & Vs. ACIT-5(3), Mumbai Oxidation Pvt. Ltd., 17/14, Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai-400007 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ PAN/GIR No. : AABCT 4373 M (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./ITA No.1789/Mum/2013 & ITA No.3664/Mum/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-2010 & 2010-2011) ACIT-5(3), Mu…

Suman Kadam, Thane vs. ITO WD 2(4), Thane

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2777/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Pawan Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2777/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Suman Kadam Ito, Ward 2(4), बनाम/ Vardaan, 6Th Floor, S/1, Narmada Apartment, Cabin Cross Road, Bhayandar (E), Ashar I. T. Park, Road No. 16-Z, Vs. Thane-401 105 Wagle Indl. Estate, Thane-400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Afipk 3600 D (Assessee) (Revenue) : आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3256/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) बनाम/ Ito, Ward 2(2), Suman Kadam Thane-400 604 Thane-401 105 Vs. (Revenue) : (Assessee) : Shri Vijay Shah Assessee By Revenue By : Shri Debabrata Baidya सुनवाई क" तार"ख / : 12.5.2016 Date Of Hearing घोषणा क" तार"ख / : 08.8.2016 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, A. M.: These Are Cross Appeals, I.E., By The Assessee & The Revenue, Arising Out Of The Order By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Thane (‘Cit(A)’ For Short) Dated 27.2.2014, Partly Allowing The Assessee’S Appeal Contesting Its Assessment U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ Hereinafter) For The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2008-09 Vide Order Dated 31.12.2010. 2

For Respondent: Shri Debabrata Baidya
Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54F

…arising in the instant appeal is the restriction of the claim for exemption u/s. 54F to Rs.39,25,249/-, i.e., as against the claimed sum of Rs.52,67,319/-. In respect of the first issue, as explained by the Hon’ble Apex Court in CIT vs. Shelly Products [2003] 261 ITR 367 (SC), the liability to tax does not depend upon assessment, but arises as soon as the Finance Act prescribes the rate/s for the relevant year, i.e., u/s.4 of the Act. As such, even where the assessment does not survive or is held as void ab-initio, the tax paid by way of self-assessment tax could not be refunded to the assessee. However, just bec…

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

The appeal is partly allowed

ITA 3688/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Oct 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri Inturi Rama Rao Assessment Year : 2005-06 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, Bses Bhawan, Nehru Place, Circle-3(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2005-06 Deputy Cit, Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Circle 3(1), Bses Bhavan, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2006-07 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, Bses Bhawan, Nehru Place, Circle-3(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Cit, Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Circle 3(1), Bses Bhavan, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 154

…ds all barriers and the rules or procedures or technicalities of law cannot stand in the way of administration of justice. Law has to bend before justice” (emphasis supplied) 14.11 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Shelly Products And Another: 261 ITR 367 observed that if the assessee has by mistake or inadvertence or on account of ignorance, included in his income any amount which is exempted from payment of tax or is not income within the contemplation of law, the assessee may bring the same to the notice of the assessing officer, which if satisfied, may grant the assessee necessary relief and…