CIT v. Rajiv Garg

313 ITR 256High Court2009#2608 most cited

What is CIT v. Rajiv Garg authority for?

An assessee's agreement to an addition does not automatically prove concealment, and voluntary surrender of income without corroborative material cannot sustain a penalty for concealment.

45

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Rajiv Garg · 313 ITR 256 · penalty for concealment · voluntary surrender of income · agreement to addition · Section 271(1)(c) · Section 271AAB · corroborative material for penalty · concealment not proved by surrender · Section 69A penalty

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Rajiv Garg

Vizag Apparel Park for Export, Visakhapatnam vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 600/HYD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita No. 600/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Vizag Apparel Park For Income Tax Officer, Export, Vs. Ward-17(1), Visakhapatnam Hyderabad [Pan No. Aaccv3708M] अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Ms. Aditi Goyal, DR
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “SMC”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 600/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Vizag Apparel Park for Income Tax Officer, Export, Vs. Ward-17(1), Visakhapatnam Hyderabad [PAN No. AACCV3708M] अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee by: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR रधजस्‍व द्वधरध/Revenue by: Ms. Aditi Goyal, DR सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date of hearing: 26/12/2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement on: 28/12/2023 आदेश / ORDER Aggrieved by the order dat…