CIT v. Punjab Stainless Steel Industries

364 ITR 144Supreme Court of India2014#1951 most cited

What is CIT v. Punjab Stainless Steel Industries authority for?

The Supreme Court holds that ICAI Guidance Notes and accounting methods prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) can be relied upon for computing "turnover," especially for tax audit purposes under Section 44AB and for transactions involving shares and derivatives.

59

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Punjab Stainless Steel Industries · 364 ITR 144 · Section 44AB · ICAI Guidance Note · turnover computation · shares derivatives turnover · speculative transaction turnover · method of accounting · business income · Supreme Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Punjab Stainless Steel Industries

The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi Circle, Vapi vs. M/S. Mitsu Limited, Daman

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3510/AHD/2016[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Sandip Gosain & Shri O. P. Meenav. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 03 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Co.No.1 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant 3 84/Ahd/ 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of 2006 Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 4 1672/Ah 2003- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 04 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 5 1764/Ah 2003- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 04 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q 6 1000/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2016 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 7 3510/Ah 2000- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2016 01 Commissioner Of Page 2 Of 83 Mitsu Ltd. V. Acit- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,Co-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/Ahd/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 Income Tax-Vapi 304/2, Iind Phase, Circle, Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q

Section 143

…Page 1 of 83 Mitsu Ltd. v. ACIT- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,CO-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/AHD/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, सुरत "यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI SANDIP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O. P. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER V. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/s. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant d/2006 03 304/2, IInd Phase, Commissioner of GIDC, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi PAN: AACCM 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/s. Mitsu Limited, d/2006 03 Commissioner of…

M/S. Mitsu Private Limited, Vapi vs. The ACIT, Vapi Circle, Vapi

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1000/AHD/2016[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 May 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Sandip Gosain & Shri O. P. Meenav. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 03 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Co.No.1 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant 3 84/Ahd/ 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of 2006 Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 4 1672/Ah 2003- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2006 04 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 5 1764/Ah 2003- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2006 04 Commissioner Of 304/2, Iind Phase, Income Tax-Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Circle, Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q 6 1000/Ah 2002- M/S. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant D/2016 03 304/2, Iind Phase, Commissioner Of Gidc, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 7 3510/Ah 2000- Assistant V. M/S. Mitsu Limited, D/2016 01 Commissioner Of Page 2 Of 83 Mitsu Ltd. V. Acit- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,Co-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/Ahd/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 Income Tax-Vapi 304/2, Iind Phase, Circle, Vapi Gidc, Vapi 396195 Pan: Aaccm 2764 Q

Section 143

…Page 1 of 83 Mitsu Ltd. v. ACIT- Vapi/I.T.A. No.1671-1371,CO-184,1672-1764,1614 &1000/AHD/2006/A.Y.02-03,03-04,06-07.02-03 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, सुरत "यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI SANDIP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O. P. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER V. ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं././././I "नधा"र अपीलाथ" Appellant S .T.A No. ण N वष"/A Y: 1 1671/Ah 2002- M/s. Mitsu Limited, V. Assistant d/2006 03 304/2, IInd Phase, Commissioner of GIDC, Vapi 396195 Income Tax-Vapi PAN: AACCM 2764 Q Circle, Vapi 2 1371/Ah 2002- Assistant V. M/s. Mitsu Limited, d/2006 03 Commissioner of…

ACIT 6(3), Mumbai vs. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3608/MUM/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Sri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Sri Nk Pradhan, Am आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 2548/Mum/2011 (यनधाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2002-03) Glaxosmithkline The Dy. Commissioner Of Pharmaceuticals Limited Income-Tax, Range 6(3), बनाम/ Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Vs. Mumbai-400 030 Mumbai-400 020 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aaacg4414B आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita Nos. 3608 & 2261/Mum/2011 (यनधाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years 2002-03) The Dy. Commissioner Of Glaxosmithkline Income-Tax, Range 6(3), Pharmaceuticals Limited बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 030 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Appellant By : S/Shri Rajan R. Vora, Nikhil Tiwari, Ars प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Anand Mohan, Cit Dr सुनवाई की िारीख / Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2019 घोर्णा की िारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 21.02.2020

For Appellant: S/Shri Rajan R. VoraFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan, CIT DR
Section 4Section 80H

…d the action of the Assessing Officer. 4. The learned authorized representative submitted, now the issue is settled in favour of the assessee by virtue of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Punjab Stainless Steel Industry (2014) 364 ITR 144 (SC), wherein, it has been held that income from the sale of scrap cannot be included in total turnover. He submitted, though, while deciding identical issue in assessee’s own case in Assessment Years 1998-99 to 2000-01, the Tribunal has held that the income received from the sale of scrap is to be included in the total turnover for computing ded…

Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai vs. D.C.I.T. RG.6(3), Mumbai

In the result, appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2548/MUM/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Sri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Sri Nk Pradhan, Am आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 2548/Mum/2011 (यनधाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2002-03) Glaxosmithkline The Dy. Commissioner Of Pharmaceuticals Limited Income-Tax, Range 6(3), बनाम/ Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Vs. Mumbai-400 030 Mumbai-400 020 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aaacg4414B आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita Nos. 3608 & 2261/Mum/2011 (यनधाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years 2002-03) The Dy. Commissioner Of Glaxosmithkline Income-Tax, Range 6(3), Pharmaceuticals Limited बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 030 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Appellant By : S/Shri Rajan R. Vora, Nikhil Tiwari, Ars प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Anand Mohan, Cit Dr सुनवाई की िारीख / Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2019 घोर्णा की िारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 21.02.2020

For Appellant: S/Shri Rajan R. VoraFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan, CIT DR
Section 4Section 80H

…d the action of the Assessing Officer. 4. The learned authorized representative submitted, now the issue is settled in favour of the assessee by virtue of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Punjab Stainless Steel Industry (2014) 364 ITR 144 (SC), wherein, it has been held that income from the sale of scrap cannot be included in total turnover. He submitted, though, while deciding identical issue in assessee’s own case in Assessment Years 1998-99 to 2000-01, the Tribunal has held that the income received from the sale of scrap is to be included in the total turnover for computing ded…

DCIT 6(3), Mumbai vs. Galxo Smithkine Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2261/MUM/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Sri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Sri Nk Pradhan, Am आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita No. 2548/Mum/2011 (यनधाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year 2002-03) Glaxosmithkline The Dy. Commissioner Of Pharmaceuticals Limited Income-Tax, Range 6(3), बनाम/ Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Vs. Mumbai-400 030 Mumbai-400 020 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) स्र्थायी लेखा सुं./Pan No. Aaacg4414B आयकर अपील सुं./ Ita Nos. 3608 & 2261/Mum/2011 (यनधाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years 2002-03) The Dy. Commissioner Of Glaxosmithkline Income-Tax, Range 6(3), Pharmaceuticals Limited बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 030 (अपीलार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Appellant By : S/Shri Rajan R. Vora, Nikhil Tiwari, Ars प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Anand Mohan, Cit Dr सुनवाई की िारीख / Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2019 घोर्णा की िारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 21.02.2020

For Appellant: S/Shri Rajan R. VoraFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan, CIT DR
Section 4Section 80H

…d the action of the Assessing Officer. 4. The learned authorized representative submitted, now the issue is settled in favour of the assessee by virtue of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Punjab Stainless Steel Industry (2014) 364 ITR 144 (SC), wherein, it has been held that income from the sale of scrap cannot be included in total turnover. He submitted, though, while deciding identical issue in assessee’s own case in Assessment Years 1998-99 to 2000-01, the Tribunal has held that the income received from the sale of scrap is to be included in the total turnover for computing ded…