COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX-VII, NEW DELHI vs. PUNJAB STAINLESS STEEL INDUSTRIES

CIVIL APPEAL No. 5592/2008Supreme Court[2014] 8 S.C.R. 72905 May 2014Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: ANIL R. DAVE, DIPAK MISRA14 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The respondent-assessee, Punjab Stainless Steel Industries, is a manufacturer and exporter of stainless steel utensils. During its manufacturing process, a portion of the steel becomes unusable scrap, which is then sold in the local market. The assessee included the sale proceeds of this scrap in its total turnover for the purpose of calculating deduction under Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income Tax challenged this inclusion. The appeals before the Supreme Court were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-VII, New Delhi, against the assessee.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the sale proceeds of steel scrap are not includible in the total turnover for the purpose of calculating deduction under Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court reasoned that the term 'turnover' in ordinary accounting parlance refers to the sale proceeds of the goods in which the business unit primarily deals. The assessee is primarily a manufacturer and seller of stainless steel utensils, not scrap. Therefore, the sale of scrap, which is a by-product of the manufacturing process and not the primary business, should not be treated as 'sales' or 'turnover' for the purpose of Section 80-HHC. The Court relied on the guidance provided by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and the object of Section 80-HHC, which is to encourage exports and foreign exchange earnings. The High Court's view that scrap proceeds are not includible in total turnover was upheld. The appeals were dismissed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the sale proceeds of unused/unusable steel scrap sold in the local market by a steel utensil manufacturer are includible in the total turnover for the purpose of calculating deduction under Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not explicitly record the assessee's contentions. However, it implies the assessee's position was that the scrap sale proceeds should be included in turnover. Revenue's Contention: The revenue contended that the sale proceeds of scrap should be included in the total turnover for calculating the deduction under Section 80-HHC.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80-HHC,Section 44AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2014) 8 S.C.R. 729 COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX-VII, NEW DELHI v. PUNJAB STAINLESS STEEL INDUSTRIES (Civil Appeal No. 5592 of 2008) MAY 5, 2014 [ANIL R. DAVE AND DIPAK MISRA, JJ.] .· Income Tax Act, 1961: A B s. 80-HHC - Deduction - Sale proceeds of unused! c unusable portion of steel scrap sold in local market by fbe steel utensils manufacturer - Whether incltJdible in total turnover for the purpose of calculating deduction u/s.80HHC of the Act - Held: Not includible. s. 80-HHC - Object of - Discussed. D Turnover - Meaning of - Discussed.

The respondent-assessee is a manufacturer and exporter of stainless steel utensils. In the process of E manufacturing stainless steel utensils, some unused portion of the steel was treated as scrap and disposed of in the local market. The income arising from the said sale was shown in the profit and loss account.

The question which has arisen for consideration in F the instant appeals was whether the sale proceeds of ·such scrap of steel is to be included in the total turnover 'for the purpose of calculating the deduction under Section 80-HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. To ascer

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80-HHC

All 26 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80-HHC →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →