CIT v. Naresh Kumar Agarwal

53 Taxmann.com 306High Court2015#740 most cited

What is CIT v. Naresh Kumar Agarwal authority for?

A statement recorded under Section 132(4) during a search operation is akin to a statement under Section 162 of Cr.P.C. and cannot be treated as a proven fact or clinching evidence on its own, serving merely as a basis for further investigation.

137

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Naresh Kumar Agarwal · Section 132(4) statement · evidentiary value · search and seizure · not proven fact · 162 Cr.P.C. · voluntary admission · retracted statement · surrender of income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Naresh Kumar Agarwal