CIT v. MWP Ltd.

41 Taxmann.com 496High Court2014#6095 most cited

What is CIT v. MWP Ltd. authority for?

Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) requires a specific satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order; a mere mention is insufficient and renders the proceedings liable to be quashed.

19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,315 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. MWP Ltd. · Section 271(1)(c) · penalty proceedings · satisfaction in assessment order · quashing penalty · concealment of income · search assessment · unexplained expenditure · unexplained investment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. MWP Ltd.

CIT v. MWP Ltd. (41 Taxmann.com 496) — Cited in 19 Judgments | BharatTax