CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd.

380 ITR 130High Court2016#1357 most cited

What is CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd. authority for?

For computing presumptive income under Section 44BB, gross receipts do not include service tax reimbursements received from a client (like ONGC) if such amounts are not payments for services or plant/machinery directly used in the prospecting, extraction, or production of mineral oils.

84

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd. · 380 ITR 130 · Section 44BB · gross receipts · presumptive income · service tax reimbursement · mineral oils · ONGC · oil exploration services

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd.

DCIT(International Taxation)-3(3)(1), Mumbai vs. M/S. Nabors Drilling International Limited, Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1215/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Nabors Drilling Income Tax, (International Internationallimited Taxation)-3(3)(1) C/O. Nangia & Co Ca’S R.No.1630, 16Th Floor 1101, Tower-B, Peninsula Air India Building, Business Park, Ganpat Rao Nariman Point, Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Mumbai – 400 021 Mumbai - 400013 Pan/Gir No.Aadcn7265N (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Jet Drilling(S) Pte.Ltd 1St Floor, Ajanta Executive Income Tax, (International Taxation)-3(3)(1) Centre, 8, Juhu Tara Road R.No.1630, 16Th Floor Juhu, Mumbai-400 064 Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 Pan/Gir No.Aabcj9895N (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Novodrill Limited Income Tax, (International C/O. Nangia & Co. Ca’S Taxation)-3(3)(1) 1101, Tower-B, Peninsula R.No.1630, 16Th Floor Business Park, Ganpat Rao Air India Building, Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 013 Mumbai – 400 021 Pan/Gir No.Aadcn0630M (Appellant) .. (Respondent) आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Appeals In Ita Nos. 1215/Mum/2019, 1216/Mum/2019, 1321/Mum/2019 & 1214/Mum/2019 For A.Yrs.2014-15 & 2015-16 Arise Out Of The Order By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-57, Mumbai In Appeal Dated 27/12/2018, 28/12/2018 & 20/12/2018 Respectively (Ld. Cit(A) In Short) Against The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 144C(3) & 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Respectively (Hereinafter Referred To As Act) Dated, 27/12/2016 27/12/2017, 08/02/2017 & 29/12/2016 Respectively By The Ld. Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax(It)-3(3)(1), Mumbai (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. Ao).

Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 44B

….2018 had an occasion to consider the very same issue and held as under:- “4. We find that this issue is squarely covered in favour of assessee by the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of DIT vs. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd. [2016] 380 ITR 130 (Del) and also CBDT Circular No. 1/ 2014 dated 13.01.2014, wherein it is clarified as under: - “2. Attention of CBDT has also been drawn to the judgement of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court dated 1-7-2013, in the case of CIT (TDS) Jaipur v. Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure (Income-tax Appeal No.235, 222, 238 and 239/2011), holding that if as per th…