DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. DEEPWATER PACIFIC 1 INC., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that service tax collected does not form part of the gross receipts for the purpose of computation of income under Section 44BB. This decision followed previous judgments by the Delhi High Court and the ITAT itself.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which excluded service tax from the gross revenue for computing income under Section 44BB. The assessee contended that service tax has no profit element and is collected statutorily.
What were the issues?
Whether service tax collected by the assessee is includible in gross revenue for the purpose of computation of income under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Mitchell Drilling International P. Ltd.84 citing380 ITR 130 · 2016 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “F” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. & SHRI O.P. KANT, A.M.
ORDER This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2, Noida, Dated 19th November, 2015, for the assessment year 2011-2012, challenging the Order of Ld. CIT(A) in holding that the receipts on account of service tax are not income chargeable in gross revenue of the assessee for the purpose of computation of profit under the provisions of Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2 ITA.No.707/Del./2016 M/s. Deepwater Pacific 1 Inc., Mumbai. 2. The contention of the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) was that service tax has no profit element in it and it is collected on account of statutory requirements, therefore, it is not taxable under section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Several decisions in support of the same were relied upon. The Ld. CIT(A) accepted the contention of assessee and deleted the addition.
At the outset, Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that similar issue was decided by ITAT, Delhi B- Bench in the case of same assessee for A.Y. 2012-2013 in ITA.No.3965/Del./2016 and Departmental Appeal have been dismissed vide Order dated 26.04.2018 on the identical issue. The findings of the Tribunal in para-3 is reproduced as under :
“3. We have heard both the sides and perused the relevant material on record. The issue raised in this ground is no more res Integra in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in DIT vs. Mitchell Drilling International 3 ITA.No.707/Del./2016 M/s. Deepwater Pacific 1 Inc., Mumbai.
Pvt. Ltd. (2016) 380 ITR 130 (Del) in which it has been held that collection of service tax does not form part of gross receipts for the purpose of computation of income u/s 44BB of the Act. Similar view has been taken by the Delhi Tribunal in DCIT (International Taxation) vs. Baker Hughes, Singapore Pte vide its order dated 23.03.2018 in ITA No.6259/Del/2016. Respectfully following the precedent, we uphold the impugned order directing the exclusion of the amount of service tax for the purpose of computation of income u/s 44BB of the Act.”
The Ld. D.R. did not dispute the same.
Considering the above fact, we are of the view that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the above Order of the Tribunal. Therefore, the departmental appeal has no merit, the same is accordingly dismissed.
4 ITA.No.707/Del./2016 M/s. Deepwater Pacific 1 Inc., Mumbai. 6. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 44BB
- DCIT, Jaipur vs Oil India Ltd., AssamITA 1534/JPR/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- Dolphin Drilling Limited, Dehradun vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (…ITA 52/DDN/2020[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Dolphin Drilling Ltd, Noida vs ACIT, International Taxation, Circle- 2…ITA 5492/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
- Aban Singapore Pte Ltd, Chennai vs DCIT Intl Tax 1(1), ChennaiITTPA 29/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed12 Jun 2026AY 2023-24
- Baker Hughes Energy Technology Uk Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 2081/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed27 May 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026