CIT v. Maruti Fabrics

47 Taxmann.com 298High Court2014#6381 most cited

What is CIT v. Maruti Fabrics authority for?

The Settlement Commission can use material produced by the assessee or evidence recorded during its proceedings against the assessee, provided there is incriminating material. If no such evidence is found for a disclosed amount, an addition cannot be made based on that disclosure.

18

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Maruti Fabrics · 47 taxmann.com 298 · Settlement Commission · section 245C · section 245D · incriminating material · disclosure · additions · Settlement Commission proceedings

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Maruti Fabrics

Mrs. Renu Sehgal, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Jaipur

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is allowed and that of the

ITA 708/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 837/Jp/2018 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2012-13 Cuke The Acit Smt. Renu Sehgal Vs. Central Circle-3 27, Onkar Nagar, Civil Lines Jaipur Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aepps 3048 M Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 708 & 709 Jp/2018 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year : 2012-13 & 2015-16 Cuke Mrs. Renu Sehgal The Dcit Vs. 227-278, Nemisagar Colony Central Circle-3, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Jaipur Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aepps 3048 M Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Varinder Mehta, Cit-Dr Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri P.C. Parwal, Ca Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 06/08/2019 ?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 19/08/2019 Vkns'K@ Order Per Vijay Pal Rao, Jm There Are Cross Appeals For The Assessment Year 2012-13 Directed Against The Order Dated 09-04-2013 Of The Ld. Cit(A)-4, Jaipur. The 2 Smt. Renu Sehgal Vs Dcit, Central Circle-3, Jaipur

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta, CIT-DR fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 51Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH ‘A’, JAIPUR Jh fot; iky jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k Before : Shri Vijay Pal Rao, JM & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 837/JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2012-13 cuke The ACIT Smt. Renu Sehgal Vs. Central Circle-3 27, Onkar Nagar, Civil Lines Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AEPPS 3048 M vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 708 & 709 JP/2018 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2012-13 & 2015-16 cuke Mrs. Renu Sehga…

Lodha Estate India Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 7(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee (in Grounds Nos

ITA 5466/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Feb 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीऱसं./Ita No.5466/M/2016 (निर्धारणवषा / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Lodha Estate India Ltd. Vs. Dcit Cen Cir.7(3), Mumbai 412, 4Th Floor, 17G, Vardhaman Room No.655, Aaykarbhavan, M.K. Chamber, Cawasji Patel Road, Road, Mumbai – 400 020. Horniman Circle, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001. स्थायीऱेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacl 1723 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent) Assessee By :Shri Jitendra Jain, Advocate Respondent By :Shri V. Vidhyadhar, Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 22/02/2018 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/02/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri V. Vidhyadhar, DR
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 245CSection 245D(1)Section 37Section 40Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G”, BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C. N. PRASAD, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM आयकरअपीऱसं./ITA No.5466/M/2016 (निर्धारणवषा / Assessment Year: 2008-09) Lodha Estate India Ltd. Vs. DCIT Cen Cir.7(3), Mumbai 412, 4th Floor, 17G, Vardhaman Room No.655, AaykarBhavan, M.K. Chamber, Cawasji Patel Road, Road, Mumbai – 400 020. Horniman Circle, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001. स्थायीऱेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No. : AAACL 1723 E (Assessee) .. (Respondent) Assessee by :Shri Jitendra Jain, Advocate Respondent by :Shri V. Vidhyadhar, DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of Hearing : 22/02/2018 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date of Pronounc…

CIT v. Maruti Fabrics (47 Taxmann.com 298) — Cited in 18 Judgments | BharatTax