CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited

27 Taxmann.com 162Supreme Court of India2012#315 most cited

What is CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited authority for?

The Supreme Court restores the matter for ascertaining whether the difference between the fair market price and concessional price of sugar supplied by a cooperative sugar factory to its members should be added to its total income, considering relevant factors like state cooperative society directions.

263

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited · Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana · Section 143(3) · Section 250 · Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules 79(A) · cooperative sugar factory · concessional sugar price · fair market price difference · total income · member cane-growers · matter restored

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited

Rajarambapu Patil Ssk Ltd, Sangli vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 2, Sangli

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1867/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1867/Pun/2017 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Rajarambapu Patil Ssk Ltd, The Assistant Commissioner Of Sakharale, Islampur, Vs Income Tax, Circle-2, Sangli. Dist. Sangli – 415 414. Pan: Aaaar 0790 D Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee Assessee By Shri Prasanna L Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Deepak Garg - Dr Date Of Hearing 07/03/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/04/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Kolhapur Dated 16.05.2017For The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessee Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Ld. Cit(A) Ought To Have Followed The Judgement Of Itat, Mumbai Dated 16/5/1968 In Pravara Ssk In Ita No. 10939-42 Upheld By Hon’Ble Supreme Court, 94 Itr 321, Which Was Accepted By It Dept, For Over 3 Decades & As Held By Supreme Court In Radhasoami Satsang, 193 Itr 321, It Would Not Be Appropriate To Allow The Position To Be Changed In A Subsequent Year, As Re- Confirmed By Hon’Ble Supreme Court In Municipal Corp. Of Thane V. Vidyut Metalics (2007) 8 Scc 688. 2. Ld. Cit(A) Ought To Have Held That It Is Government’S Policy To Encourage Co-Operatives & Appellant’S Business Which Is Run On Co- Operative Principles & Policy & Has Its Aims & Objects That Are

Section 9

…आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण“ए”"यायपीठपुणेम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.1867/PUN/2017 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Rajarambapu Patil SSK Ltd, The Assistant Commissioner of Sakharale, Islampur, Vs Income Tax, Circle-2, Sangli. Dist. Sangli – 415 414. PAN: AAAAR 0790 D Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee Assessee by Shri Prasanna L Joshi – AR Revenue by Shri Deepak Garg - DR Date of hearing 07/03/2022 Date of pronouncement 22/04/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This is an appeal filed…

Nira Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle - 14, Pune

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2178/PUN/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Feb 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2178/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 Nira Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., A/P. Shahji Nagar, Tal. Indapur, Dist. Pune-413106. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aaaan1256C बनाम / V/S. Dcit, Circle-14, ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Pankaj Garg सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04.02.2020 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2020 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-7, Pune Dated 03.07.2017 For The Assessment Year 2004-05. 2. Despite Service Of Notice By The Itat, There Was None To Represent The Assessee. Therefore, This Appeal Is Being Decided On The Basis Of Material Available On Record & After Hearing The Ld. Dr For The Revenue. 3. The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing Of White Sugar. In This Appeal, The Issues Raised By The Assessee In The Grounds Of Appeal Are :-

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” "यायपीठ पुणे म" । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.2178/PUN/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2004-05 Nira Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., A/p. Shahji Nagar, Tal. Indapur, Dist. Pune-413106. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant PAN : AAAAN1256C बनाम / V/s. DCIT, Circle-14, ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Pankaj Garg सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date of Hearing : 04.02.2020 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 06.02.2020 आदेश / ORDER PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM: This…