CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited

27 Taxmann.com 162Supreme Court of India2012#315 most cited

What is CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited authority for?

The Supreme Court restores the matter for ascertaining whether the difference between the fair market price and concessional price of sugar supplied by a cooperative sugar factory to its members should be added to its total income, considering relevant factors like state cooperative society directions.

263

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited · Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana · Section 143(3) · Section 250 · Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules 79(A) · cooperative sugar factory · concessional sugar price · fair market price difference · total income · member cane-growers · matter restored

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited

Bhima Ssk Limited, Soalpur vs. ITO, Ward2(1), Solapur

Accordingly. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed proper opportunity of hearing by the AO

ITA 2113/PUN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr.Dipak P.Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.2113/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., Vs Ward-2(1), Pune. A/P. Takli Sikandar, Tal. Mohol, Dist. Solapur – 413248 Pan: Aaaab 0872 C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Hanmant Dattatry Dhavle - Ar Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 10/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 20/06/2022 आदेश / Order Per S.S.Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For A.Y.2016-17 Is Directed Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-7, Pune’S Order, Dated 25.10.2019 Passed In Case No.Pn/Cit(A)-7/Wd-2(1)10308/2018-19 Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 In Short “The Act”. Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused. 2. Coming To The Assessee’S Sole Substantive Grievance Raised In The Instant Appeal That Both The Lower Authorities Have Erred In Law & On Facts In Disallowing/Adding Back The Amount In Dispute Of Rs.92,66,829/- On Account Of Sugar Sold At Concessional Rates To Its Members, We Note

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 28

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” "ायपीठ पुणे म" । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.DIPAK P.RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.2113/PUN/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., Vs Ward-2(1), Pune. A/p. Takli Sikandar, Tal. Mohol, Dist. Solapur – 413248 PAN: AAAAB 0872 C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee by Shri Hanmant Dattatry Dhavle - AR Revenue by Shri S P Walimbe – DR Date of hearing 10/06/2022 Date of pronouncement 20/06/2022 आदेश / ORDER Per S.S.Godara, JM: This…