CIT v. Kamal Galani

95 Taxmann.com 261High Court2018#3605 most cited

What is CIT v. Kamal Galani authority for?

A revisionary order under section 263 can only be made if the Assessing Officer's order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, and not merely based on the Principal Commissioner's apprehension or surmises without basis.

33

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v Kamal Galani · section 263 · erroneous and prejudicial · revisionary power · Principal Commissioner · Assessing Officer · search assessment · prejudicial to interest of revenue · natural justice · loose papers

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Kamal Galani

M/S. Vmware Software India Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-7, Bengaluru

In the result, appeal by the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2205/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevanand Shri B. R. Baskaranassessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Vm Software India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Pr. Cit, Kalyani Magnum, Block-1, Iii Floor, 165/2, Range – 7, Doraisanipalya, Iim Post, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 076. Pan : Aaccv 4573 E Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Sumer Singh Meena, Cit(Dr)(Osd)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 18.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.11.2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(OSD)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI B. R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s. VM Software India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Pr. CIT, Kalyani Magnum, Block-1, III Floor, 165/2, Range – 7, Doraisanipalya, IIM Post, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 076. PAN : AACCV 4573 E Assessee by : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(OSD)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing : 18.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 22.11.2021 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President This is an appeal by the a…

Dipal Piyush Palkiwala, Ahmedabad vs. The ITO, Ward-2(1)(4), Ahmedabad

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee i

ITA 3462/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.839/Ahd/2015 & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.3462/Ahd/2016 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dipal Piyush Palkhiwala, Ito Ward-4(4) 27, Rivera Greens, 1St Floor, Vs Gokuldham Navjeevan Trust Building Sarkhej-Sanand Road, Sanathal, Ahmedabad-380014 Ahmedabad-382210 अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Aseem Thakkar, Ar Revenue By : Smt. Rita Dokania, Cit- Dr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Rita Dokania, CIT- DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘D’ अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.839/Ahd/2015 & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.3462/Ahd/2016 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dipal Piyush Palkhiwala, ITO Ward-4(4) 27, Rivera Greens, 1st Floor, Vs Gokuldham Navjeevan Trust Building Sarkhej-Sanand Road, Sanathal, Ahmedabad-380014 Ahmedabad-382210 अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Aseem Thakkar, AR Revenue by : Smt. Rita Dokania, CIT- DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Da…

Dipal Piyush Palkiwala, Ahmedabad vs. ITO, Ward-4(4), Ahmedabad

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee i

ITA 839/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.839/Ahd/2015 & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.3462/Ahd/2016 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dipal Piyush Palkhiwala, Ito Ward-4(4) 27, Rivera Greens, 1St Floor, Vs Gokuldham Navjeevan Trust Building Sarkhej-Sanand Road, Sanathal, Ahmedabad-380014 Ahmedabad-382210 अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Aseem Thakkar, Ar Revenue By : Smt. Rita Dokania, Cit- Dr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Rita Dokania, CIT- DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘D’ अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.839/Ahd/2015 & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.3462/Ahd/2016 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dipal Piyush Palkhiwala, ITO Ward-4(4) 27, Rivera Greens, 1st Floor, Vs Gokuldham Navjeevan Trust Building Sarkhej-Sanand Road, Sanathal, Ahmedabad-380014 Ahmedabad-382210 अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Aseem Thakkar, AR Revenue by : Smt. Rita Dokania, CIT- DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Da…

Durgesh Autofin P.Ltd, Bijnor vs. Prcit, Muzaffarnagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2539/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Jm Ita No. 2539/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Durgesh Autofin P. Ltd., Vs Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, C/O Sh. Pankaj Kumar, Director, Muzaffarnagar-251002 S/O Late Sh. Tejpal Singh, Mandi Kotla, Near Nehru Murti, Chandpur, Bijnot, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaccd0768P Assessee By : Sh. Vivek Bansal, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Rachna Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.08.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.10.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 13.03.2018 Of Ld. Pr. Cit, Muzaffarnagar U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Act).

For Appellant: Sh. Vivek Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 269SSection 271DSection 41(1)Section 68

…td. (2009) 227 CTR 133 (Del.) " ITO Vs D.G. Housing Projects Ltd. (2012) 343 ITR 329 (Del.) " CIT Vs Shree Manjunathesware Packing & Products Camphor Works (1998) 231 ITR 53 (SC) " DIT Vs Jyoti Foundation (2013) 357 ITR 388 (Del.) " CIT Vs Kamal Galani (2018) 95 Taxmann.com 261 (Guj.) " CIT Vs Jawahar Bhattacharjee (2012) 341 ITR 434 (Gauhati) 24 Durgesh Autofin P. Ltd. " CIT Vs Arvind Jewellers (2003) 259 ITR 502 (Guj.) " Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. Vs CIT (2000) 243 ITR 83 (SC) " CIT Vs Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR 282 (SC) 19. It was contended that detailed enquiries were conducted by the AO on both the iss…