CIT v. Kamal Galani

95 Taxmann.com 261High Court2018#3605 most cited

What is CIT v. Kamal Galani authority for?

A revisionary order under section 263 can only be made if the Assessing Officer's order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, and not merely based on the Principal Commissioner's apprehension or surmises without basis.

33

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,315 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v Kamal Galani · section 263 · erroneous and prejudicial · revisionary power · Principal Commissioner · Assessing Officer · search assessment · prejudicial to interest of revenue · natural justice · loose papers

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Kamal Galani

Shreeji Infratech, Vadodara vs. The Pr. CIT-1, Vadodara

ITA 117/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra R. Kamblem/S. Shreeji Infratech, Vs. Pcit, 110, Near Silver Wood Society, Vadodara-1, Opp. Billabong School, Vadodara Nr. Vadsar Bridge, Vadsar, Vadodara-390010 [Pan : Acwfs 1409 F] M/S. Shreeji Infra, Vs. Pcit, 344, 375, Opp. Cm Patel Farm Vadodara-1, House, Nr. Sidheswar Complex, Vadodara Kalali, Vadodara-390012 [Pan : Acrfs 5269 C] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Shri Parin Shah, Ar Respondent By: Shri V. Nandakumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 16.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 02.06.2025 O R D E R Per Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-:-

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 269SSection 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT MS. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s. Shreeji Infratech, Vs. PCIT, 110, Near Silver Wood Society, Vadodara-1, Opp. Billabong School, Vadodara Nr. Vadsar Bridge, Vadsar, Vadodara-390010 [PAN : ACWFS 1409 F] M/s. Shreeji Infra, Vs. PCIT, 344, 375, Opp. CM Patel Farm Vadodara-1, House, Nr. Sidheswar Complex, Vadodara Kalali, Vadodara-390012 [PAN : ACRFS 5269 C] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Shri Parin Shah, AR Respondent by: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT-DR Date of Hear…

Sanguine Media Limited, Chennai vs. PCIT-3, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly- allowed

ITA 936/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 936/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18 Sanguine Media Ltd., The Principal Commissioner Plot No.135A, 1St Floor, Vs. Of Income Tax - 3, Chandran Nagar Main Road, Chennai. Chrompet, Chennai – 600 044. Pan: Aaecs 2217C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri Neeraj Mangla, Ca (Through Virtual Mode) ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.12.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 01.01.2025

For Appellant: Shri Neeraj Mangla, CAFor Respondent: Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,‘सी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी जॉज" जॉज" के, उपा"य" एवं "ी जगद"श, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 936/CHNY/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18 Sanguine Media Ltd., The Principal Commissioner Plot No.135A, 1st Floor, Vs. of Income Tax - 3, Chandran Nagar Main Road, Chennai. Chrompet, Chennai – 600 044. PAN: AAECS 2217C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant by : Shri Neeraj Mangla, CA (Through virtual mode) ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respo…

Kaivan Jitendrkumar Shah HUF, Ellisbridge Ahmedabad vs. PCIT, Ahmedabad-1, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 644/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year : 2013-14 Kaivan Jitendrakumar Shah Huf, The Pr. Commissioner Of 27A, Anmol, Maharashtra Society, Vs Income Tax, Nr. Lions Hall, Mithakali, Ahmedabad-1, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad-380009 Ahmedabad Pan : Aahhk 9488 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sulabh Padshah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Sudhendu Das, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12/08/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 14/08/2024 आदेश/O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Sulabh Padshah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD \ BEFORE SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2013-14 Kaivan Jitendrakumar Shah HUF, The Pr. Commissioner of 27A, Anmol, Maharashtra Society, Vs Income Tax, Nr. Lions Hall, Mithakali, Ahmedabad-1, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad-380009 Ahmedabad PAN : AAHHK 9488 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sulabh Padshah, AR Revenue by : Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 12/08/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 14/08/2024 आदेश/O R D E R P…

Hbc Lifesciences Private Limited, Gandhinagar vs. The Pr. CIT-3, Ahmedabad

In the result, appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 328/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 328/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19) िनधा"रण वष" Hbc Lifesciences Private Principal Commissioner बनाम बनाम/ बनाम बनाम Limited Of Income Tax-3 Vs. B-218, Mayur House, Ahmedabad G.I.D.C., Electronic Estate Sector-25, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382016 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aacch1407M (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Parin Shah, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Dr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, Cit. Dr 20/06/2024 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 05/07/2024 O R D E R Per Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Ahmedabad, (In Short The ‘Pcit’) Dated 25.03.2023 In Exercise Of The Revisionary Powers Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act” In Short], For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Return Of Income For A.Y. 2018-19 Was Filed By The Assessee On 30.10.2018 Declaring

For Appellant: Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, CIT. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 37(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICAL MEMBER & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 328/Ahd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19) िनधा"रण वष" HBC Lifesciences Private Principal Commissioner बनाम बनाम/ बनाम बनाम Limited of Income Tax-3 Vs. B-218, Mayur House, Ahmedabad G.I.D.C., Electronic Estate Sector-25, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382016 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AACCH1407M (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant by : Shr…

CIT v. Kamal Galani (95 Taxmann.com 261) — Cited in 33 Judgments | BharatTax