CIT v. Hero Cycles (P.) Ltd.
228 ITR 463Supreme Court of India1997#318 most cited
What is CIT v. Hero Cycles (P.) Ltd. authority for?
A point not examined on facts or in law cannot be treated as a mistake apparent on record for rectification purposes.
262
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Hero Cycles (P.) Ltd. · Hero Cycles · 228 ITR 463 · 94 Taxmann 271 · mistake apparent on record · rectification · point not examined · facts or law · Section 143(3) · Section 14A
Also reported as
94 Taxmann 271