CUMMINS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA (P) LTD.,DEWAS vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), UJJAIN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal quashed the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer for not incorporating the Document Identification Number (DIN). The Tribunal held that the assessment order was invalid for want of DIN, making it deemed to have never been issued.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The primary issue revolved around transfer pricing adjustments and other grounds related to disallowances and deductions.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was the validity of an assessment order passed without a Document Identification Number (DIN), rendering it invalid. The Tribunal also considered transfer pricing adjustments and other grounds raised by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 154,Section 10AA,Section 92C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(19)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing7 Taxmann 13 · 1981 · SC
- UCO Bank v. CIT486 citing104 Taxmann 547 · 1999 · SC
- CIT v. Hero Cycles (P.) Ltd.262 citing94 Taxmann 271 · 1997 · SC
- Navnitlal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen230 citing1 SCR 909 · 1965
- Keshavji Ravji and Co. v. CIT209 citing82 ITR 913 · 1971 · SC
- Varghese v. ITO, Ernakulum164 citing4 SCC 173 · 1981
- UCO Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B122 citing4 SCC 599 · 1999
- Andhra Pradesh in CIT v. Smt. Nayana P. Dedhia82 citing270 ITR 572 · 2004 · HC
- 4 SCC 47475 citing4 SCC 474 · 1972
- Back Office IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India73 citing2021 SCC OnLine DEL 2742 · 2021
- Ellerman Lines Ltd. v. CIT73 citing4 SCC 565 · 1979
- DCIT v. Sunita Finlease Ltd.60 citing330 ITR 491 · 2011 · HC
- CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius42 citing293 Taxmann 385 · 2023 · HC
- Amal Kumar Ghosh v. Asstt. CIT39 citing45 Taxmann.com 482 · 2014
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Jagat Novel Exhibitors Private Limited14 citing356 ITR 562 · 2013 · HC
- Dy. CIT v. Sunita Finlease Ltd.12 citing11 Taxmann.com 241 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Smt. Nayana P. Dedhia11 citing141 Taxmann 603 · 2004 · HC
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption v. Tata Medical Centre Trust4 citing154 Taxmann.com 600 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against assessment order dated 15.10.2019 passed u/s 144C r.w. section 143(3) in pursuant to the Directions of DRP dated 26.08.2019 passed u/s 144C(5) for A.Y.2015-16. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
“Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, Cummins Technologies India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "CTIPL" or "the Appellant") prefers an appeal for the assessment year 2015- 16 against the order dated October 15, 2019 (received on October 15, 2019 ) passed by the learned Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1(1), Ujjain ("hereinafter referred to as "Assessing Officer" / "AO"]
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026