CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius
293 Taxmann 385High Court2023#2787 most cited
What is CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius authority for?
Failure to mention DIN in an assessment order is an irregularity, not an illegality, and does not automatically invalidate the order, especially when the matter is under review by higher courts regarding the significance of DIN.
42
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Brandix Mauritius · DIN · assessment order · irregularity · illegality · consequential effect · subjudice · Apex Court · Delhi High Court
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius
Showing 1–20 of 42 · Page 1 of 3