CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius

293 Taxmann 385High Court2023#2787 most cited

What is CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius authority for?

Failure to mention DIN in an assessment order is an irregularity, not an illegality, and does not automatically invalidate the order, especially when the matter is under review by higher courts regarding the significance of DIN.

42

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Brandix Mauritius · DIN · assessment order · irregularity · illegality · consequential effect · subjudice · Apex Court · Delhi High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius

DHANTERASH SALES PRIVATE LIMITED. ,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-12(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1184/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.1184/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dhanterash Sales Pvt. Ltd………….........................…………………….……Appellant 229, Ajc Bose Road, Kolkata – 700020. [Pan: Aadcd2722L] Vs. Ito, Ward-12(1), Kolkata………..…..…….…..….........…........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, Cit- Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 21, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 26, 2024 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 01.11.2023 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.1184/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dhanterash Sales Pvt. Ltd………….........................…………………….……Appellant 229, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata – 700020. [PAN: AADCD2722L] vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata………..…..…….…..….........…........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Abhijit Kundu, CIT- DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : February 21, 2024 Date of pronouncing t…

Showing 120 of 42 · Page 1 of 3

CIT (International Taxation) v. Brandix Mauritius (293 Taxmann 385) — Cited in 42 Judgments | BharatTax