CIT v. Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd.

55 Taxmann.com 523High Court2015#291 most cited

What is CIT v. Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The interest rate for benchmarking foreign currency loans advanced to Associated Enterprises should be the market-determined rate applicable to the currency of the loan, such as LIBOR for US Dollar loans, rather than a domestic lending rate like the Indian PLR.

273

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 369,743 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd. · 55 Taxmann.com 523 · 231 Taxmann 401 · section 92B · section 92CA(3) · arm's length interest · foreign currency loan · outstanding receivables · LIBOR · PLR · benchmarking interest · associated enterprise

Also reported as

231 Taxmann 401

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 92BSection 144C(13)Section 144BSection 144C(5)Section 234BSection 92CA(3)Section 234C
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

interest on outstanding receivablessection 92b(1)safe harbour rulessafe harboursection 92bsection 72asection 92(1)preliminary expensescup methodcorporate guaranteeworking capital adjustmenttransfer pricing order

Judgments citing CIT v. Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd.

Wipro Ge Healthcare Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in IT(TP)A No

ITA 703/BANG/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Pradeep &For Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 254Section 92C

…IT(TP)A Nos.344 & 703/Bang/2021 M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.344/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Private Ltd. No.4, Kadugodi Industrial Area Whitefield, Bangalore 560 067 Deputy Commissioner of (Presently at Prestige Shanthiniketan, Vs. Income-tax 6th Floor, Crescent 4, ITPI, Whitefield, Circle 7(1)(1) Bangalore 560 048) Bangalore PAN NO : AAACW1685J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Wipro…

Wipro Ge Healthcare Private Limited (Earlier Known As Ge Medical Systems India Private Limited), Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in IT(TP)A No

ITA 344/BANG/2021[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Oct 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri K.R. Pradeep &For Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 254Section 92C

…IT(TP)A Nos.344 & 703/Bang/2021 M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.344/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Private Ltd. No.4, Kadugodi Industrial Area Whitefield, Bangalore 560 067 Deputy Commissioner of (Presently at Prestige Shanthiniketan, Vs. Income-tax 6th Floor, Crescent 4, ITPI, Whitefield, Circle 7(1)(1) Bangalore 560 048) Bangalore PAN NO : AAACW1685J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Wipro…

Ntt Data Fa Insurance Systems (India) Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 261/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.261/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, Sr. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IT(TP)A No.261/Bang/2021 NTT Data FA Insurance Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.261/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 NTT Data FA Insurance Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. Ground Floor, Block-2, Plot Deputy Commissioner of No.123, EPIP Phase-II, Income-tax Whitefield Industrial Area Circle-3(1)(1) Vs. Hoodi Village, K.R. Puram Bengaluru Hobli, Bengaluru Karnataka 560 066 PAN NO : AAACF9123A APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Sr.…

Hewlett Packard (India) Software Operation Private Limited, 2016-17 vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.213/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IT(TP)A No.213/Bang/2021 M/s. Hewlett Packard (India) Software Operation Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.213/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Hewlett Packard (India) Software Operation Pvt. Ltd. Deputy Commissioner of Survey No.192, Whitefield Road Income-tax Mahadevapura Post Vs. Circle-3(1)(1) Bangalore 560 048 Bengaluru PAN NO : AAACH7164B APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.R. Respondent by : Capt. Pradeep Arya, D.R. Date…

Watermarke Residency Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-17(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA Nos

ITA 740/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri CA Raghunathan KannanFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR and Ms. N. Swapna

…ITA Nos.740/Hyd/2019, 1590/Hyd/2019 and 1591/Hyd/2019 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Sl. ITA No Assess- Appellant / Assessee Respon- No ment Year dent 1 740/Hyd/2019 2013-14 DCIT, Watermarke Residency Circle – Limited, Hyderabad. 2 1590/Hyd/2019 2014-15 17(2), PAN : AAACW7096B Hyderabad. 3 1591/Hyd/2019 2015-16 Appellant by : Shri CA Raghunathan Kannan & Akshay Surna Siddharth Surna Respondent by : Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR and Ms. N. Swapna Date of Hearing : 08.09.2022 Date of Pron…

Watermark Residency Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-17(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA Nos

ITA 1591/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri CA Raghunathan KannanFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR and Ms. N. Swapna

…ITA Nos.740/Hyd/2019, 1590/Hyd/2019 and 1591/Hyd/2019 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Sl. ITA No Assess- Appellant / Assessee Respon- No ment Year dent 1 740/Hyd/2019 2013-14 DCIT, Watermarke Residency Circle – Limited, Hyderabad. 2 1590/Hyd/2019 2014-15 17(2), PAN : AAACW7096B Hyderabad. 3 1591/Hyd/2019 2015-16 Appellant by : Shri CA Raghunathan Kannan & Akshay Surna Siddharth Surna Respondent by : Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR and Ms. N. Swapna Date of Hearing : 08.09.2022 Date of Pron…

Watermark Residency Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-17(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeals of the assessee vide ITA Nos

ITA 1590/HYD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri CA Raghunathan KannanFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR and Ms. N. Swapna

…ITA Nos.740/Hyd/2019, 1590/Hyd/2019 and 1591/Hyd/2019 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Sl. ITA No Assess- Appellant / Assessee Respon- No ment Year dent 1 740/Hyd/2019 2013-14 DCIT, Watermarke Residency Circle – Limited, Hyderabad. 2 1590/Hyd/2019 2014-15 17(2), PAN : AAACW7096B Hyderabad. 3 1591/Hyd/2019 2015-16 Appellant by : Shri CA Raghunathan Kannan & Akshay Surna Siddharth Surna Respondent by : Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR and Ms. N. Swapna Date of Hearing : 08.09.2022 Date of Pron…

M/S. Harman Connected Services Corporation India Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 3(1)(2), Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 2243/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Biju, M.K., CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80GSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND Ms. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.2243/Bang/2019 Assessment year : 2015-16 Harman Connected Services Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., of Income Tax, No.3 & 3/A, EOIZ Industrial Circle 3(1)(2), Area, Survey No.85 & 86, Bengaluru. Sadarmangala Village, Krishnarajapuram Hobli, Bengaluru – 560 066. PAN: AABCG 5658E APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Respondent by : Shri. Biju, M.K., CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 07.09.2022…

Epam Systems India Private Limited (Previously Known As M/S Alliances Global Service It India Private Limited ), Hyderabad vs. DCIT., Circle-1(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 148/HYD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri UtpalsenFor Respondent: 29/07/2022
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92Section 92B

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ म" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 148/Hyd/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) EPAM Systems India Private Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, (Previously known as Circle-1(1), M/s.Alliance Global Services Hyderabad IT India Private Limited) Raidurg Village, Serilingampally Mandal [PAN No. AAACW2012R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee by: Shri Utpalsen, Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala & Sh…

Afton Chemical India Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1467/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala &For Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA No. 1467/Hyd/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Afton Chemical India Vs. Income Tax Officer, Private Limited, Ward-1(2), Hyderabad Hyderabad [PAN No. AADCP3112G] अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध / Assessee by: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala & Shri Pratheek Shah, ARs रधजस्‍व द्वधरध / Revenue by: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date of hearing: 27/07/20…

DCIT, CC-29, New Delhi vs. Dharampal Satyalpal Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 1977/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 1977/Del/2020 (A.Y 2014-15)

For Respondent: Shri Vivek Verma
Section 132Section 142Section 144C(4)Section 153ASection 80Section 801BSection 80I

…1 ITA Nos. 1977/Del/2020 DCIT Vs. Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH: ‘I’ NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI G. S. PANNU, PRESIDENT AND SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1977/DEL/2020 (A.Y 2014-15) DCIT, Central Circle-29 Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Room No. 318, 3rd Floor, E- Vs. 1711, S.P. Mukherjee Marg, 2, ARA Centre, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extension, PAN No. AAACD0132H New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by : Sh. R. S. Singhvi & Satyajeet Goel, CA Department by: Shri Vivek Verma, [CIT] – D.R.; Date of Hearing 05.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement 02.09.202…

DCIT, CC-29, New Delhi vs. Dharampal Satyapal Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 1976/DEL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 1976/Del/2020 (A.Y 2013-14)

For Respondent: Shri Vivek Verma
Section 144C(4)Section 80Section 801BSection 80I

…1 ITA Nos. 1976 & 1977/Del/2020 DCIT Vs. Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [ DELHI BENCH: ‘I’ NEW DELHI ] BEFORE SHRI G. S. PANNU, PRESIDENT AND SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1976/DEL/2020 (A.Y 2013-14) DCIT, Central Circle- Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. 29Room No. 318, 3rd Floor, Vs. 1711, S.P. Mukherjee Marg, E-2, ARA Centre, New Delhi Jhandewalan Extension, PAN No. AAACD0132H New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by : Sh. R. S. Singhvi & Satyajeet Goel, CA Department by: Shri Vivek Verma, [CIT] – D.R.; Date of Hearing 05.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement 02.0…

Arm Embedded Technologies Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 1(1)(1), Bengaluru

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 235/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Aug 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: 2.1 Rejecting the value of international transaction of provision of SWD and proFor Respondent: Shri T. Suryanarayana
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92D

…an international transaction and ALP of such international transaction has to be determined by Ld.TPO. In so far as charging of rate of interest is concerned, he relied on decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Cotton Naturals (I) Pvt. Ltd (2015) 276 CTR 445 (Del) holding that currency in which such amount is to be re-paid, determines rate of interest. He, therefore, concluded by summing up that interest on outstanding trade receivables is an international transaction and its ALP has been correctly determined. We have perused the submissions advanced by both the sides in the light of the records plac…

M/S Praxair India Pvt Ltd, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Ltpu Circle-1, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2839/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Aug 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sri.T.Suryanarayana, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Bijoy Kumar Panda, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 37

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, JM & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, AM IT(TP)A No.2839/Bang/2017 : Asst.Year 2013-2014 M/s.Praxair India Private Limited The Deputy Commissioner of Mercury 2B Block, 6th Floor Income-tax, Large Tax Payer v. Prestige Technology Park Unit, Circle 1 Bangalore. Outer Ring Road, Marathahalli Bangalore – 560 103. PAN : AAACP9993J. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.T.Suryanarayana, Senior Advocate Respondent by : Sri.Bijoy Kumar Panda, CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 25.08.2022 Date of Hearing : 26.07.2022 O R D E R Per…

DCIT, Circle-2(1)(1), Baroda vs. M/S. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Baroda

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1520/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Advocate & Shri Parin Shah
Section 10Section 115JSection 28

…l contentions and have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. At the very outset, we have to state that the revenue has no power to re-characterize the transaction. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Cotton Naturals India Pvt. Ltd. 276 CTR 445 at para 17 of its order has held that Chapter X and Transfer Pricing rules do not permit the Revenue authorities to step into the shoes of the assessee and decide whether or not a transaction should not be entered. It is for the assessee to take commercial decisions and decide how to conduct and carry on its business. Actual business transactions…

DCIT, Circle-2(1)(1), Baroda vs. M/S. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Baroda

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1519/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Advocate & Shri Parin Shah
Section 10Section 115JSection 28

…l contentions and have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. At the very outset, we have to state that the revenue has no power to re-characterize the transaction. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Cotton Naturals India Pvt. Ltd. 276 CTR 445 at para 17 of its order has held that Chapter X and Transfer Pricing rules do not permit the Revenue authorities to step into the shoes of the assessee and decide whether or not a transaction should not be entered. It is for the assessee to take commercial decisions and decide how to conduct and carry on its business. Actual business transactions…

Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Vadodara vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(1)(1), Baroda

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1463/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Advocate & Shri Parin Shah
Section 10Section 115JSection 28

…l contentions and have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. At the very outset, we have to state that the revenue has no power to re-characterize the transaction. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Cotton Naturals India Pvt. Ltd. 276 CTR 445 at para 17 of its order has held that Chapter X and Transfer Pricing rules do not permit the Revenue authorities to step into the shoes of the assessee and decide whether or not a transaction should not be entered. It is for the assessee to take commercial decisions and decide how to conduct and carry on its business. Actual business transactions…

Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Vadodara vs. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(1)(1), Baroda

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1462/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Advocate & Shri Parin Shah
Section 10Section 115JSection 28

…l contentions and have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. At the very outset, we have to state that the revenue has no power to re-characterize the transaction. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Cotton Naturals India Pvt. Ltd. 276 CTR 445 at para 17 of its order has held that Chapter X and Transfer Pricing rules do not permit the Revenue authorities to step into the shoes of the assessee and decide whether or not a transaction should not be entered. It is for the assessee to take commercial decisions and decide how to conduct and carry on its business. Actual business transactions…

M/S. Meritor C vs. India Private Limited, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 249/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…an international transaction and ALP of such international transaction has to be determined by Ld.TPO. In so far as charging of rate of interest is concerned, he relied on decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in CIT vs. Cotton Naturals (I) Pvt. Ltd (2015) 276 CTR 445 (Del) holding that currency in which such amount is to be re-paid, determines rate of interest. He, therefore, concluded by summing up that interest on outstanding trade receivables is an international transaction and its ALP has been correctly determined. 17.7. We have perused the submissions advanced by both the sides in the light of the record…

M/S Quicklogic Software (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-3(1)(1), Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 181/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 181/Bang/2022 Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Quicklogic Software (India) Pvt. Ltd., No. 10 Brindavan, The Deputy 3Rd Floor, Commissioner Of Yashoda Nagar Main Income Tax, Road, Circle 3(1)(1), Jakkur Plantation, Vs. Bangalore. Bengaluru – 560 064. Pan: Aaacq0656P Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Mahaveer C Jain, Ca : Shri Sumer Singh Meena Cit Revenue By Dr Date Of Hearing : 12-07-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 27-07-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against Order Dated 25/01/2022 By The National Faceless Assessment Centre For A.Y. 2017-18 On Following Revised Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Mahaveer C Jain, CA
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 92C

…nsaction and ALP of such international transaction has to be determined by Ld.TPO. In so far as charging of rate of interest is concerned, he relied on decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. Cotton Naturals (I) Pvt. Ltd reported in (2015) 276 CTR 445 (Del) holding that currency in which such amount is to be re-paid, determines rate of interest. He, therefore, concluded by summing up that interest on outstanding trade receivables is an international transaction and its ALP has been correctly determined. 14.7 We have perused the submissions advanced by both the sides in the light of the records…