CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.

80 Taxmann.com 221High Court2017#158 most cited

What is CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd. authority for?

Section 14A cannot be invoked to disallow expenditure if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year. The Explanation to Section 14A is prospective in nature.

444

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Chettinad Logistics · Section 14A · disallowance for exempt income · no exempt income earned · Explanation to Section 14A · prospective application · Madras High Court 80 Taxmann.com 221 · Supreme Court SLP not admitted

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.

Srm Civil Works Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 429/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 429/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/S. Srm Civil Works Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 23, Vengada Mangalam, Vs. Income Tax, Chengalpattu Tk., Central Circle I(3), Kanchipuram District Chennai – 34. [Pan:Aagcs1005G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri B. Purushotaman, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Mrs. R. Anita, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 07.01.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.03.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 18, Chennai, Dated 22.11.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Disallowance Made Under Section 14A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Brief Facts Relating To The Disallowance Made Under Section 14A Of The Act Are That Against The Investment Of ₹.2,34,29,175/- Made In The Financial Year 2011-12 In The Shares Of Hemadri Cements Ltd., The Total Investments

For Appellant: Shri B. Purushotaman, C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. R. Anita, JCIT
Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘‘डी” "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी धु"ु" आर.एल रे"ी, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी एस जयरामन, लेखा सद" के सम" Before Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member & Shri S. Jayaraman, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 429/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/s. SRM Civil Works Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner of No. 23, Vengada Mangalam, Vs. Income Tax, Chengalpattu Tk., Central Circle I(3), Kanchipuram District Chennai – 34. [PAN:AAGCS1005G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri B. Purushotaman, C.A. ""थ" की ओ…