CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.

80 Taxmann.com 221High Court2017#158 most cited

What is CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd. authority for?

Section 14A cannot be invoked to disallow expenditure if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year. The Explanation to Section 14A is prospective in nature.

444

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,164 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Chettinad Logistics · Section 14A · disallowance for exempt income · no exempt income earned · Explanation to Section 14A · prospective application · Madras High Court 80 Taxmann.com 221 · Supreme Court SLP not admitted

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Chettinad Logistics (P) Ltd.

M/S. Sri Venkatachalapathy Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., Rajapalayam vs. DCIT, Corporate Cirlce - 2, Madurai

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 529/CHNY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.528 & 529/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. Sri Venkatachalapathy Spinning Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Mills Private Limited,454, Kothankulam Income Tax, Village, Srivilliputhur Road, Corporate Circle 2, Rajapalayam 626 117. Madurai. [Pan:Aadcs9037R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 10.02.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.02.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Madurai Both Dated 20.12.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15. The Only Effective Common Ground Raised In Both The Appals Of The Assessee Relates To Confirmation Of Disallowance Made Under Section 14A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 R.W. Rule 8D Of The Income Tax Rules, 1962. 2

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल, लेखा सद" के सम" । Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.528 and 529/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s. Sri Venkatachalapathy Spinning Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Mills Private Limited,454, Kothankulam Income Tax, Village, Srivilliputhur Road, Corporate Circle 2, Rajapalayam 626 117. Madurai. [PAN:AADCS9037R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से /…

M/S. Sri Venkatachalapathy Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., Rajapalayam vs. DCIT, Corporate Cirlce - 2, Madurai

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 528/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.528 & 529/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. Sri Venkatachalapathy Spinning Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Mills Private Limited,454, Kothankulam Income Tax, Village, Srivilliputhur Road, Corporate Circle 2, Rajapalayam 626 117. Madurai. [Pan:Aadcs9037R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 10.02.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.02.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Madurai Both Dated 20.12.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15. The Only Effective Common Ground Raised In Both The Appals Of The Assessee Relates To Confirmation Of Disallowance Made Under Section 14A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 R.W. Rule 8D Of The Income Tax Rules, 1962. 2

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘ए’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल, लेखा सद" के सम" । Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.528 and 529/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s. Sri Venkatachalapathy Spinning Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Mills Private Limited,454, Kothankulam Income Tax, Village, Srivilliputhur Road, Corporate Circle 2, Rajapalayam 626 117. Madurai. [PAN:AADCS9037R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से /…

North Dinajpur Tea Agro (P) Ltd., Kolkata vs. PCIT-2, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 452/KOL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2015-16 North Dinajpur Tea Agro Pcit-2, Kolkata (P) Ltd. C/O Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates Vs. Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata- 700069. Pan: Aaacn8881B (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Amol Kamat, Cit-Dr. Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.02.2022 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) By The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred As The ‘Pcit’) Relevant To A.Y 2015-16. 2. The Only Issue Raised In The Various Grounds Of Appeal By The Assessee Is Against The Revisionary Jurisdiction Exercised By Pcit U/S 263 Of The Act On The Ground That The Assessment Dated 24.11.20117 Was Erroneous & Prejudicial To The Interest Of The Revenue.

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amol Kamat, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH “A”, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 North Dinajpur Tea Agro PCIT-2, Kolkata (P) Ltd. C/o Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates Vs. Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2nd Floor, Kolkata- 700069. PAN: AAACN8881B (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Amol Kamat, CIT-DR. Date of Hearing : 21.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 01.02.2022 O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The present appeal has bee…

Gvk Transportation Private Limited, Secunderabad vs. ACIT, Circle-2(2), Hyderabad

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 311/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year: 2012-13 Gvk Transportation Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Secunderabad. Circle – 2(2), Hyderabad. Pan : Aadcg5295P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. Khyati Chadda Revenue By: Shri Yvst Sai. Date Of Hearing: 06.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.01.2022 O R D E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. This Assessee’S Appeal For A.Y. 2012-13 Arises From The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 2, Hyderabad’S Order Dated 28.07.2016 In Ita No.0049/2015-16, Involving Proceedings U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [In Short, ‘The Act’]. Heard Both The Parties. Case File Perused.

For Appellant: Ms. Khyati ChaddaFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(iii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad (Through Video Conferencing) Before Shri S.S. Godara, Judicial Member AND Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2012-13 GVK TRANSPORTATION Vs. The Asst. Commissioner of PRIVATE LIMITED, Income Tax, Secunderabad. Circle – 2(2), Hyderabad. PAN : AADCG5295P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Ms. Khyati Chadda Revenue by: Shri YVST Sai. Date of hearing: 06.01.2022 Date of pronouncement: 11.01.2022 O R D E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -…

M/S. Trianz Holdings Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 7(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, ground 34 is allowed

ITA 2639/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Nov 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm It(Tp)A No.2639/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2015-2016 M/S.Trianz Holdings Pvt. Ltd. The Assistant Commissioner #165/2, 6Th Floor, Kalyani Of Income-Tax, Circle 7(1)(1) V. Bangalore. Magnum, Doraisanipalya, Iim Post Bennerghatta Road Bangalore – 560 076. Pan : Aafca8051P. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sri.K.R.Vasudevan, Advocate Respondent By : Sri.Pradeep Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 16.11.2021 Date Of Hearing : 15.11.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Final Assessment Order Dated 30.10.2019. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2015-2016. 2. The Assesee Has Raised 36 Grounds In Its Memorandum Of Appeal. However, Learned Ar Had Argued Only Following Six Issues:-

For Appellant: Sri.K.R.Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “C”, BANGALORE Before Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM IT(TP)A No.2639/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2015-2016 M/s.Trianz Holdings Pvt. Ltd. The Assistant Commissioner #165/2, 6th Floor, Kalyani of Income-tax, Circle 7(1)(1) v. Bangalore. Magnum, Doraisanipalya, IIM Post Bennerghatta Road Bangalore – 560 076. PAN : AAFCA8051P. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.K.R.Vasudevan, Advocate Respondent by : Sri.Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 16.11.2021 Date of Hearing : 15.11.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, JM This appeal at…