North Dinajpur Tea Agro (P) Ltd., Kolkata vs. PCIT-2, Kolkata
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 452/KOL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Feb 2022AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2015-16 North Dinajpur Tea Agro Pcit-2, Kolkata (P) Ltd. C/O Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates Vs. Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2Nd Floor, Kolkata- 700069. Pan: Aaacn8881B (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate Respondent By : Shri Amol Kamat, Cit-Dr. Date Of Hearing : 21.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.02.2022 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) By The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata (Hereinafter Referred As The ‘Pcit’) Relevant To A.Y 2015-16. 2. The Only Issue Raised In The Various Grounds Of Appeal By The Assessee Is Against The Revisionary Jurisdiction Exercised By Pcit U/S 263 Of The Act On The Ground That The Assessment Dated 24.11.20117 Was Erroneous & Prejudicial To The Interest Of The Revenue.
For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amol Kamat, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263
…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH “A”, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 North Dinajpur Tea Agro PCIT-2, Kolkata (P) Ltd. C/o Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates Vs. Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2nd Floor, Kolkata- 700069. PAN: AAACN8881B (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Siddharth Agarwal, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Amol Kamat, CIT-DR. Date of Hearing : 21.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 01.02.2022 O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The present appeal has bee…