CIT v. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune & Others

88 Taxmann.com 278Supreme Court of India2017#9162 most cited

What is CIT v. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune & Others authority for?

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is not attracted when the issue regarding the nature of receipt (capital vs. revenue) is debatable and the assessee has not yet received the subsidy.

12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2018.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune · penalty u/s 271(1)(c) · inaccurate particulars · debatable issue · freight subsidy · capital receipt · revenue receipt · SC

Judgments citing CIT v. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune & Others

CIT v. Chaphalkar Brothers Pune & Others (88 Taxmann.com 278) — Cited in 12 Judgments | BharatTax