CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State

200 Taxmann 220High Court2011#220 most cited

What is CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State authority for?

Interest earned by a Co-operative Society from investing fixed deposits in banks is entitled to a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

348

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State · Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank · Section 80P(2)(a)(i) · deduction for co-operative society · interest from fixed deposits · bank deposits · co-operative society income · Section 80P deduction · investment income exemption · gross total income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State

Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Mumbai vs. ITO 15(3)(4), Mumbai

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 3783/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri N.K. Pradhan, Am Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Income Tax Officer Patsanstha Ltd. Ward 15(3)(4) Dion Shelter Co Op Hsg Matru Mandir, Grant Rd, Society Ist Floor, Shop No. 108 Mumbai-07 Vs. S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E) Mumbai-400 024 Pan No. Aabas6993E Appellant .. Respondent Vs. Income Tax Officer Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Ward 15(3)(4) Patsanstha Ltd. Matru Mandir, Grant Rd, Dion Shelter Co Op Hsg Society Mumbai-07 Ist Floor, Shop No. 108 S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E)S Mumbai-400 024 Pan No. Aabas6993E Appellant .. Respondent .. Mr. M Subramanian, Ar Assessee By Revenue By .. Mr. K. Ravi Kiran, Dr .. Date Of Hearing 16-05-2017 Date Of Pronouncement .. 24-05-2017 O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh, Jm:

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)Section 4Section 5Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI N.K. PRADHAN, AM Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Income Tax Officer Patsanstha Ltd. Ward 15(3)(4) Dion Shelter Co Op HSG Matru Mandir, Grant RD, Society IST Floor, Shop No. 108 Mumbai-07 Vs. S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E) Mumbai-400 024 PAN No. AABAS6993E Appellant .. Respondent Vs. Income Tax Officer Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Ward 15(3)(4) Patsanstha Ltd. Matru Mandir, Grant RD, Dion Shelter Co Op HSG Society Mumbai-07 IST Floor, Shop No. 108 S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E)s Mumbai-400 024 PAN No. AABAS6993E Appellant .. Respondent…

ITO 15(3)(4), Mumbai vs. Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 3769/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri N.K. Pradhan, Am Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Income Tax Officer Patsanstha Ltd. Ward 15(3)(4) Dion Shelter Co Op Hsg Matru Mandir, Grant Rd, Society Ist Floor, Shop No. 108 Mumbai-07 Vs. S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E) Mumbai-400 024 Pan No. Aabas6993E Appellant .. Respondent Vs. Income Tax Officer Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Ward 15(3)(4) Patsanstha Ltd. Matru Mandir, Grant Rd, Dion Shelter Co Op Hsg Society Mumbai-07 Ist Floor, Shop No. 108 S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E)S Mumbai-400 024 Pan No. Aabas6993E Appellant .. Respondent .. Mr. M Subramanian, Ar Assessee By Revenue By .. Mr. K. Ravi Kiran, Dr .. Date Of Hearing 16-05-2017 Date Of Pronouncement .. 24-05-2017 O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh, Jm:

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)Section 4Section 5Section 56Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI N.K. PRADHAN, AM Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Income Tax Officer Patsanstha Ltd. Ward 15(3)(4) Dion Shelter Co Op HSG Matru Mandir, Grant RD, Society IST Floor, Shop No. 108 Mumbai-07 Vs. S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E) Mumbai-400 024 PAN No. AABAS6993E Appellant .. Respondent Vs. Income Tax Officer Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Ward 15(3)(4) Patsanstha Ltd. Matru Mandir, Grant RD, Dion Shelter Co Op HSG Society Mumbai-07 IST Floor, Shop No. 108 S.B. Barve Marg, Kurla (E)s Mumbai-400 024 PAN No. AABAS6993E Appellant .. Respondent…

ACIT, Circle - 56, Kolkata vs. The West Bengal State Co-Opt. Bank Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeals as well as the cross-objections are dismissed

ITA 737/KOL/2011[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2016AY 1996-97

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm & Dr.Arjun Lal Saini, Am] I.T.Anos.737-742/Kol/2011 Assessment Years : 1996-97 To 2001-02 A.C.I.T., Circle-56, -Vs.- The West Bengal State Co-Operative Kolkata Bank Ltd.Kolkata [Pan : Aaaat 7072 N] (Respondent) (Appellant) C.O.Nos.36-40/Kol/2011 (A/O I.T.A Nos. 737-741/Kol/2011 ) Assessment Years : 1996-97 To 2000-2001 The West Bengal State Co-Operative -Vs.- A.C.I.T., Circle-56, Bank Ltd., Kolkata Kolkata [Pan : Aaaat 7072 N] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Department : Shri G.Mallikarjuna, Cit(Dr) For The Assessee : Shri N.C.Mondal, Ca Date Of Hearing : 27.07.2016. Date Of Pronouncement : 03.08.2016. Order Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri N.C.Mondal, CAFor Respondent: Shri G.Mallikarjuna, CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…tributable to carrying on the business of banking and therefore it is liable to be deducted in terms of Section 80P(1) of the Act. In fact similar view is taken by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd. 336 ITR 516(AP). 13. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the appellate authorities denying the benefit of deduction of the aforesaid amount is unsustainable in law…..” 13. In view of the aforesaid judicial pronouncements, we are of the view that the objections raised by the revenue in the grounds of appeal before us, cannot be sustained. Respectf…