Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

143 Taxmann.com 178Supreme Court of India2022#28 most cited

What is Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Employee contributions to provident fund and ESI deposited by an employer beyond the due dates prescribed under the respective special Acts are not allowable as a deduction under section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Such disallowance can be made during processing under section 143(1).

1,392

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Checkmate Services · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 43B · employees contribution to PF · ESI payment · due date for deposit · Section 143(1) disallowance · delayed payment of PF/ESI · Provident Fund · Employee State Insurance · 448 ITR 518 · 143 Taxmann.com 178

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

Macrotech Deveopers Limited (Sucessor to Shreeniwas Cotton Mills Limited, Mumbai vs. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Range-7(3), Mumbai

In the result appeal of the learned assessing officer and assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2040/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Kuldip Singh, Jm M/S. Macrotech Developers Limited (Successor Of Shreeniwas Cotton Dcit, Cc-7(3) Mills Ltd) 412, 4Th Floor, 17G, Vardhaman Room No. 655, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. M.K.Road, Mumbai-400 020 Chamber, Cawasji Patel Street, Fort Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Macrotech Developers Limited (Successor Of Shreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd) Dcit, Cc-7(3) 412, 4Th Floor, 17G, Vardhaman Room No. 655, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Chamber, Cawasji Patel Street, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400 020 Fort Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacl1490J Assessee By : Shri Niraj Sheth Revenue By : Shri Asif Karmali

For Appellant: Shri Niraj ShethFor Respondent: Shri Asif Karmali
Section 115JSection 14ASection 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “J” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JM M/s. Macrotech Developers Limited (Successor of Shreeniwas Cotton DCIT, CC-7(3) Mills Ltd) 412, 4th Floor, 17G, Vardhaman Room No. 655, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. M.K.Road, Mumbai-400 020 Chamber, Cawasji Patel Street, Fort Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent) M/s. Macrotech Developers Limited (Successor of Shreeniwas Cotton Mills Ltd) DCIT, CC-7(3) 412, 4th Floor, 17G, Vardhaman Room No. 655, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Chamber, Cawasji Patel Street, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400 020 Fort Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (R…

Sudhakar Rao Dondapati, Hyderabad vs. ITO, Ward-13(3), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 129/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumarआ.अपी.सं/Ita No. 129/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Sudhakar Rao Dondapati, Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad Vs. Ward-13(3), [Pan No. Aeupr8022H] Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri T. Balaji, Ar रधजस्‍व द्वधरध/Revenue By: Shri Waseem Ur Rehman, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख /Date Of Hearing: 21/03/2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख /Pronouncement On: 21/03/2023

For Appellant: Shri T. Balaji, ARFor Respondent: Shri Waseem UR Rehman, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “SMC”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं/ITA No. 129/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Sudhakar Rao Dondapati, Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad Vs. Ward-13(3), [PAN No. AEUPR8022H] Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee by: Shri T. Balaji, AR रधजस्‍व द्वधरध/Revenue by: Shri Waseem UR Rehman, DR सुिवधई की तधरीख /Date of hearing: 21/03/2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख /Pronouncement on: 21/03/2023 आदेश / ORDER Aggrieved by the order dated 28/12/2022 p…

M/S Capital Tours(India) Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed

ITA 507/KOL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A No.507/Kol/2020 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S Capital Tours (India) Pvt. Ltd..............................………...…..…Appellant 1, J Embassy Building, 4, Shakepeare Sarani, Kolkata- 700 071. [Pan: Aabcc2821K] Vs. Ito, Ward-12(1), Kolkata......................................................…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Miraj D Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri P. P Barman, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 17, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 16, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 07.06.2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. That The Order Passed By The Ld. Cit (Appeals)-17, Kolkata U/S 250 Confirming The Additions & Disallowances Made By Learned Assessing Officer Is Wrong In The Law & Facts Of The Case. 2. That The Ld. Cit (Appeals) - 17, Kolkata Erred In Law As Well As On Facts Of The Case By Confirming The Disallowance Of Employee'S Contribution For

Section 14ASection 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ ‘बी’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी मनीष बोरड, लेखा सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A No.507/Kol/2020 Assessment year: 2015-16 M/s Capital Tours (India) Pvt. Ltd..............................………...…..…Appellant 1, J Embassy Building, 4, Shakepeare Sarani, Kolkata- 700 071. [PAN: AABCC2821K] vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata......................................................…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Miraj D Shah, AR, appeared on behalf of the…

Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1 (1), Dibrugarh vs. Banamalie Tea Estate, Dibrugarh

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands allowed

ITA 46/GTY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati15 Mar 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargi.T.A. No.46/Gty/2022 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Ito, Ward-1(1), Dibrugarh..…...…….....…..................….…… Appellant Vs. Banamalie Tea Estate……....……........………..…...…..…..... Respondent 4Th Floor, Pushkara House, Natun Gaon, Nh-37, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008. [Pan: Aabfb5352K] Appearances By: Shri Aakash Agarwal, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 15, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 15, 2023

Section 2Section 2(24)Section 2(24)(x)Section 250Section 3Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI ‘SMC’ BENCH, GAUHATI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member I.T.A. No.46/GTY/2022 Assessment Year: 2020-21 ITO, Ward-1(1), Dibrugarh..…...…….....…..................….…… Appellant vs. Banamalie Tea Estate……....……........………..…...…..…..... Respondent 4th Floor, Pushkara House, Natun Gaon, NH-37, Dibrugarh, Assam-786008. [PAN: AABFB5352K] Appearances by: Shri Aakash Agarwal, FCA, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the heari…

Sihw Bachan Singh, Chirang vs. CIT (Appeals), Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 12/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati15 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargi.T.A. No.12/Gty/2022 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shiw Bachan Singh……...……......…..........…..................….…… Appellant Brpl Main Gate, Dhaligaon, Assam-783385. [Pan: Axlps2160F] Vs. Ito, Ward-2, Bongaigaon.………....……........…...…...…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 15, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 15, 2023

Section 2Section 2(24)Section 2(24)(x)Section 250Section 3Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI ‘SMC’ BENCH, GAUHATI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA "ी संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य के सम" Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member I.T.A. No.12/GTY/2022 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shiw Bachan Singh……...……......…..........…..................….…… Appellant BRPL Main Gate, Dhaligaon, Assam-783385. [PAN: AXLPS2160F] vs. ITO, Ward-2, Bongaigaon.………....……........…...…...…..…..... Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : March 15, 2023 Date of pronouncing the…

Banshidhar Sewbhagovan & Co., Dibrugarh vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Dibrugarh

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati15 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No.63/Gty/2021 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Banshidhar Sewbhagovan & Co, Dibrugarh......................……….……Appellant 5Th Floor, Juction Mall, R.K.B. Path, Dibrugarh, Assam- 786001. [Pan: Aadfb7460J] Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Dibrugarh ……..…............…….......................…..…..Respondent Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 15, 2023 Order Per Manish Borad: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Pertaining To The Assessment Year (In Short “Ay”) 2019-20 Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [In Short Ld. “Cit(A)”] Dated 22.09.2021 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Assessing Officer Dated 01.05.2020. 2. The Case Was Called For. None Appeared For The Assessee. In The Past, Various Notices Have Been Served Through Rpad But There Is No Compliance. We, Therefore, Deem It Fit To Hear This Appeal With The Assistance Of Ld. Dr & The Available Records. 3. From The Perusal Of The Grounds Of Appeal, The Grievance Of The Assessee Is Two-Fold. Firstly, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming Disallowance U/S 36(1)(Va) R.W.S 2(24)(X) Of The Act For The Delay Of

Section 1Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI BENCH, GAUHATI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President and Shri Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.63/GTY/2021 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Banshidhar Sewbhagovan & Co, Dibrugarh......................……….……Appellant 5th Floor, Juction Mall, R.K.B. Path, Dibrugarh, Assam- 786001. [PAN: AADFB7460J] vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Dibrugarh ……..…............…….......................…..…..Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing…

Natural Panel Industries Private Limited, Margherita vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Digboi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 44/GTY/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati15 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No.44/Gty/2021 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Natural Panel Industries Pvt. Ltd………….......................……….……Appellant 1 No. Makum Pather, P.O. Margherita, Tinsukia, Assam – 786181. [Pan: Aaacw1839J] Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Digboi…… ……..…............…….......................…..…..Respondent Appearances By: None Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 15, 2023 Order Per Manish Borad: This Appeal Is At The Instance Of The Assessee Pertaining To The Assessment Year 2018-19 Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [In Short Ld. “Cit(A)”] Dated 16.03.2021. 2. Though The Assessee Has Filed Adjournment Application But Looking To The Grounds Of Appeal Which Leads To Disallowance Of Employees’ Contribution To Pf & Esi At Rs.6,26,597/- & Since The Issue Has Already Been Decided By The Hon’Ble Apex Court In Favour Of The Revenue, We Decide To Hear The Appeal With The Assistance Of The Ld. Dr, Since, Even If The Assessee Has Appeared, There Would Be No Change In The Outcome Of This Appeal. 3. From The Grounds Of Appeal, We Notice That So Far As The Disallowance Of Pf & Esi Is Concerned, We Find That The Hon’Ble

Section 80I

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “GUWAHATI BENCH, GAUHATI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President and Shri Manish Borad, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.44/GTY/2021 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Natural Panel Industries Pvt. Ltd………….......................……….……Appellant 1 No. Makum Pather, P.O. Margherita, Tinsukia, Assam – 786181. [PAN: AAACW1839J] vs. ITO, Ward-1, Digboi…… ……..…............…….......................…..…..Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : Fe…