National Housing Bank, New Delhi vs. Addl. CIT, New Delhi
In the result ground No. 8 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed with above direction
ITA 3704/DEL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Feb 2017AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishinational Housing Bank, Addl Cit, Core-5A, India Habitat Centre, Range-31(1), Vs. Lodhi Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) National Housing Bank, Addl Cit, Core-5A, India Habitat Centre, Range-31(1), Lodhi Road, New Delhi Vs. New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) National Housing Bank, Addl Cit, Core-5A, India Habitat Centre, Range-31(1), Vs. Lodhi Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) National Housing Bank, Addl Cit, Core-5A, India Habitat Centre, Range-31(1), Vs. Lodhi Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Page 2 Of 50 National Housing Bank, Addl Cit, Core-5A, India Habitat Centre, Range-31(1), Vs. Lodhi Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) National Housing Bank, Addl Cit, Core-5A, India Habitat Centre, Range-31(1), Vs. Lodhi Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Sh. Ashok Chopra, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Ravi Jain, CIT DR
Section 271Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)
…g the general principle that the expression " derived from" has been used by the Legislature whenever it wanted to give restricted meaning The principle has been succinctly explained by the Apex Court in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd Vs. CIT(1978) 113 ITR 84(SC) in the following words : " As regards the aspect emerging from the expression " attributable to" occurring in the phrase ' profit and gains attributable to the business of the specified industry ( here generation and distribution of electricity) on which the learned Solicitor-General relied, it will be pertinent to observe that the Legislature…