Assam Company (I) Ltd. v. CIT

256 ITR 423High Court2002#1789 most cited

What is Assam Company (I) Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Appellate authorities can admit additional legal grounds of appeal if they go to the root of the matter and do not require fresh investigation of facts. The assessing officer has a duty to correctly determine the taxable income according to law.

63

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Assam Company (I) Ltd v CIT · 256 ITR 423 · Gauhati High Court · admission of additional legal grounds · appellate authority powers · grounds going to root of matter · duty to compute correct income · assessment procedure · NTPC Ltd v CIT

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Assam Company (I) Ltd. v. CIT

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

The appeal is partly allowed

ITA 3688/DEL/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Oct 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri I.C. Sudhir & Shri Inturi Rama Rao Assessment Year : 2005-06 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, Bses Bhawan, Nehru Place, Circle-3(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2005-06 Deputy Cit, Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Circle 3(1), Bses Bhavan, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2006-07 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Vs. Assistant Cit, Bses Bhawan, Nehru Place, Circle-3(1), New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2006-07 Deputy Cit, Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd., Circle 3(1), Bses Bhavan, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. (Pan: Aagcs3187H) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 154

…otherwise, duty bound to grant relief, which the assessee may not have claimed in the return of income: - CIT vs. Mahalaxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd: 160 ITR 920 (SC) - National Thermal Power Limited v. CIT: 229 ITR 383 (SC) - Assam Company (India) Ltd. vs. CIT: 256 ITR 423 (Gau.) - Nathmal Bankatlal Parikh & Co. V. CIT: 122 ITR 168 (AP –FB) - CIT V. Smt. Archana R. Dhanswatay: 136 ITR 355 (Bom) - Smt. Shen Lata Jain V. CIT: 192 CTR 50 (J&K) 14.16 In view of the aforesaid submissions and the cited decisions, the Learned AR submitted that the assessing officer may kindly be directed to reduce the service line deposi…