Ajji Basha v. CIT

111 Taxmann.com 348High Court2019#2064 most cited

What is Ajji Basha v. CIT authority for?

The Commissioner (Appeals) must pass a speaking order on merits, considering the grounds raised in the assessee's appeal. They cannot dispose of an appeal by simply stating the Assessing Officer's order is self-speaking and requires no interference.

55

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Ajji Basha v CIT · section 250(6) · speaking order · Commissioner Appeals · reasoned order · non-application of mind · grounds of appeal · assessment records · fact finding authority

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Ajji Basha v. CIT

Mugundhan Projects Private Limited, Chennai vs. ACIT Corporate Circle 4(1), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA no

ITA 3131/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3131/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 V. M/S.Mugundhan Projects Private The Assistant Commissioner Limited, Of Income Tax, 20/12,Nedunchezian Street, Corporate Circle 4(1), Nehru Nagar,Guindy, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. [Pan: Aafcm 3266 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 133ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’""’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी र"मत कोचर, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.3131/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 v. M/s.Mugundhan Projects Private The Assistant Commissioner Limited, of Income Tax, 20/12,Nedunchezian Street, Corporate Circle 4(1), Nehru Nagar,Guindy, Chennai-600 034. Chennai. [PAN: AAFCM 3266 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by Mr.N.Kaushik Advocate…