ADIDARSHAN TRADEWING PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 12(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without passing a reasoned order as required by Section 250(6) of the Act. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) has the power to confirm, reduce, enhance, or annul the assessment and cannot dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) who had dismissed the appeal ex-parte. The original assessment order was passed u/s 144/263 of the Act, and the CIT(A) confirmed the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the assessee's appeal ex-parte without a reasoned order, and whether the CIT(A) has the power to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 251,Section 144,Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 68,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 246A,Section 46A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Nagpur v. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF)159 citing69 Taxmann.com 407 · 2016 · HC
- Ajji Basha v. CIT55 citing111 Taxmann.com 348 · 2019 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: January 21st, 2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2012-13 dated 10.07.2024, which has been passed against the assessment order u/s 144/263 of the Act, dated 30.12.2019.
More judgments on Section 251
- Jitendrakumar Bhikhabhai Shrimali, Mehsana vs ITO Ward 1, MehsaanaITA 1290/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO(Exemption), Ward, Jaipur vs Raj Rishi Bhartihari Matsya University…ITA 1167/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Urun Vividh Karyakari Vikas Society, Walwa vs ITO WD-5, SangliITA 472/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Shyam Sunder, Ballabgarh vs ITO, Ward 2(3), WardITA 1339/DEL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Shyam Sunder, Ballabgarh vs ITO, Ward 2(3), FaridabadITA 1295/DEL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026