ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd.

53 ITR (Trib) 416Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#1611 most cited

What is ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd. authority for?

Additions cannot be sustained merely on the basis of rough notings on loose sheets found during a search unless the Assessing Officer brings independent and corroborative material to prove unaccounted income, investment, or expenditure.

70

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd. · Section 132 Income Tax Act · loose sheets search · uncorroborated notings addition · unaccounted income loose papers · corroborative evidence search · evidentiary value loose documents · Section 153A assessment · Section 69 undisclosed income · search and seizure additions

Sections most often in play

Section 132(4)Section 292CSection 69Section 132Section 153ASection 69BSection 153CSection 132(4A)

Issues it is cited on

section 132(1)(a)section 35acvoluntary admissionsection 10(22)section 11(4)arbitrary and capricioussection 115bbcsection 35asection 2(45)section 164(2)cash found during searchsection 158b(b)

Judgments citing ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd.

Income Tax Officer, W-1, Hassan vs. Ramachandra Setty & Sons, Hassan

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1163/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 115BSection 132(4)Section 250Section 69B

…not supported by any corroborative material. Further the alleged parties to the transactions were not examined or cross-examined. At this point, it is appropriate to rely on the judgment of the Mumbai Bench in the case of ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [2017] 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that no addition could be simply made on the basis of uncorroborated notings in the loose papers found during the search because addition on account of alleged payment made simply on the basis of uncorroborated noting and scribbling on loose sheets made by some person have no evidentiary value and is unsustaina…

M/S. S. Ramashandra Setty & Sons, Hassan vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Hassan

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 1156/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri C. Ramesh, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 115BSection 132(4)Section 250Section 69B

…not supported by any corroborative material. Further the alleged parties to the transactions were not examined or cross-examined. At this point, it is appropriate to rely on the judgment of the Mumbai Bench in the case of ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [2017] 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that no addition could be simply made on the basis of uncorroborated notings in the loose papers found during the search because addition on account of alleged payment made simply on the basis of uncorroborated noting and scribbling on loose sheets made by some person have no evidentiary value and is unsustaina…

Mr. Abdul Khader Kodi, Kasargod, Karnataka vs. Mr. C. Vijay Jayan, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangaluru

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 638/BANG/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.636 To 638/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-17 To 2018-19 Mr. Abdul Khader Kodi Darul Huda, Near Salafi Masjid Kunjathur Via Dcit Manjeshwar Central Circle-2 Vs. Kasargod 671 323 Mangaluru Karnataka Pan No : Alhpk5340F Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Ravishankar S.V., A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: These Appeals By Assessee Are Directed By Different Orders Of Nfac For The Assessment Years 2016-17 To 2018-19 Having Common Date Dated 23.5.2022. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee In All These Appeals Are Common In Nature, Except Change In Figures. We Consider Grounds In Ita No.636/Bang/2023, Which Reads As Follows: 1. The Learned Cit(A)-2, Panaji Erred In Passing The Order In The Manner He Did. 2. The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Panaji Erred In Upholding The Additions Made By The Assessing Officer Amounting To Rs.6,25,000 As Undisclosed Business Income & Rs.1,99,40,000 As Unexplained Investments Under Section 68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Was Purely On Assumptions & Presumptions Based On The Loose Sheet Found At The Time Of Search.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar S.V., A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 34Section 68Section 69Section 69B

…rwise of the fact or contents so stated would have to be proved by admissible evidence i.e., by the evidence of those persons who can vouch safe for the truth of the facts in issue. " 7.1 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Mr. Abdul Khader Kodi, Kasargod, Karnataka vs. Mr. C. Vinod Jayan, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 637/BANG/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.636 To 638/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-17 To 2018-19 Mr. Abdul Khader Kodi Darul Huda, Near Salafi Masjid Kunjathur Via Dcit Manjeshwar Central Circle-2 Vs. Kasargod 671 323 Mangaluru Karnataka Pan No : Alhpk5340F Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Ravishankar S.V., A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: These Appeals By Assessee Are Directed By Different Orders Of Nfac For The Assessment Years 2016-17 To 2018-19 Having Common Date Dated 23.5.2022. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee In All These Appeals Are Common In Nature, Except Change In Figures. We Consider Grounds In Ita No.636/Bang/2023, Which Reads As Follows: 1. The Learned Cit(A)-2, Panaji Erred In Passing The Order In The Manner He Did. 2. The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Panaji Erred In Upholding The Additions Made By The Assessing Officer Amounting To Rs.6,25,000 As Undisclosed Business Income & Rs.1,99,40,000 As Unexplained Investments Under Section 68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Was Purely On Assumptions & Presumptions Based On The Loose Sheet Found At The Time Of Search.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar S.V., A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 34Section 68Section 69Section 69B

…rwise of the fact or contents so stated would have to be proved by admissible evidence i.e., by the evidence of those persons who can vouch safe for the truth of the facts in issue. " 7.1 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Mr. Abdul Khader Kodi, Kasargod, Karnataka vs. Mr. C. Vinod Jayan, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 636/BANG/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.636 To 638/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-17 To 2018-19 Mr. Abdul Khader Kodi Darul Huda, Near Salafi Masjid Kunjathur Via Dcit Manjeshwar Central Circle-2 Vs. Kasargod 671 323 Mangaluru Karnataka Pan No : Alhpk5340F Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Ravishankar S.V., A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: These Appeals By Assessee Are Directed By Different Orders Of Nfac For The Assessment Years 2016-17 To 2018-19 Having Common Date Dated 23.5.2022. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee In All These Appeals Are Common In Nature, Except Change In Figures. We Consider Grounds In Ita No.636/Bang/2023, Which Reads As Follows: 1. The Learned Cit(A)-2, Panaji Erred In Passing The Order In The Manner He Did. 2. The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Panaji Erred In Upholding The Additions Made By The Assessing Officer Amounting To Rs.6,25,000 As Undisclosed Business Income & Rs.1,99,40,000 As Unexplained Investments Under Section 68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Was Purely On Assumptions & Presumptions Based On The Loose Sheet Found At The Time Of Search.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar S.V., A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 34Section 68Section 69Section 69B

…rwise of the fact or contents so stated would have to be proved by admissible evidence i.e., by the evidence of those persons who can vouch safe for the truth of the facts in issue. " 7.1 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bengaluru

In the result, ITA Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 are partly allowed and ITA No

ITA 1065/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.1061 To 1066/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja No.402, 4Th Floor, Embassy Centre No.11, Crescent Road Dcit Bengaluru 560 001 Vs. Central Circle-1(3) Karnataka Bengaluru Pan No : Abkpt1011B Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. Srinivasan, A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: The Appeals In Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 Are Emanated From The Common Order Of Cit(A) Central Circle, Bengaluru For The Assessment Years 2014-15 To 2018-19 Dated 16.11.2023. Ita No.1064/Bang/2023 Is Emanated From The Order Of Cit(A) Dated 11.8.2023 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 With Regard To Levy Of Penalty U/S 271Aab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). Since The Issue In All These Appeals Is Common In Nature, These Are Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Disposed Of By This Common Order For The Sake Of Convenience. 2. First, We Will Take Up Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 For Adjudication. The Common Ground In All These Appeals Except Change In Figures, Which Reads As Under:

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 153CSection 271ASection 69

…the contents of the document by proving the signatures of the handwriting of the author thereof is to set at nought, the well-recognised rule that hearsay evidence cannot be admitted. 9.3 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bengaluru

In the result, ITA Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 are partly allowed and ITA No

ITA 1064/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.1061 To 1066/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja No.402, 4Th Floor, Embassy Centre No.11, Crescent Road Dcit Bengaluru 560 001 Vs. Central Circle-1(3) Karnataka Bengaluru Pan No : Abkpt1011B Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. Srinivasan, A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: The Appeals In Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 Are Emanated From The Common Order Of Cit(A) Central Circle, Bengaluru For The Assessment Years 2014-15 To 2018-19 Dated 16.11.2023. Ita No.1064/Bang/2023 Is Emanated From The Order Of Cit(A) Dated 11.8.2023 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 With Regard To Levy Of Penalty U/S 271Aab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). Since The Issue In All These Appeals Is Common In Nature, These Are Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Disposed Of By This Common Order For The Sake Of Convenience. 2. First, We Will Take Up Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 For Adjudication. The Common Ground In All These Appeals Except Change In Figures, Which Reads As Under:

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 153CSection 271ASection 69

…the contents of the document by proving the signatures of the handwriting of the author thereof is to set at nought, the well-recognised rule that hearsay evidence cannot be admitted. 9.3 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bengaluru

In the result, ITA Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 are partly allowed and ITA No

ITA 1062/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.1061 To 1066/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja No.402, 4Th Floor, Embassy Centre No.11, Crescent Road Dcit Bengaluru 560 001 Vs. Central Circle-1(3) Karnataka Bengaluru Pan No : Abkpt1011B Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. Srinivasan, A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: The Appeals In Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 Are Emanated From The Common Order Of Cit(A) Central Circle, Bengaluru For The Assessment Years 2014-15 To 2018-19 Dated 16.11.2023. Ita No.1064/Bang/2023 Is Emanated From The Order Of Cit(A) Dated 11.8.2023 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 With Regard To Levy Of Penalty U/S 271Aab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). Since The Issue In All These Appeals Is Common In Nature, These Are Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Disposed Of By This Common Order For The Sake Of Convenience. 2. First, We Will Take Up Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 For Adjudication. The Common Ground In All These Appeals Except Change In Figures, Which Reads As Under:

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 153CSection 271ASection 69

…the contents of the document by proving the signatures of the handwriting of the author thereof is to set at nought, the well-recognised rule that hearsay evidence cannot be admitted. 9.3 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bengaluru

In the result, ITA Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 are partly allowed and ITA No

ITA 1061/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiita Nos.1061 To 1066/Bang/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2018-19 Sri Prakash Bhajandas Talreja No.402, 4Th Floor, Embassy Centre No.11, Crescent Road Dcit Bengaluru 560 001 Vs. Central Circle-1(3) Karnataka Bengaluru Pan No : Abkpt1011B Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. Srinivasan, A.R. Respondent By : Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 01.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: The Appeals In Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 Are Emanated From The Common Order Of Cit(A) Central Circle, Bengaluru For The Assessment Years 2014-15 To 2018-19 Dated 16.11.2023. Ita No.1064/Bang/2023 Is Emanated From The Order Of Cit(A) Dated 11.8.2023 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 With Regard To Levy Of Penalty U/S 271Aab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). Since The Issue In All These Appeals Is Common In Nature, These Are Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Disposed Of By This Common Order For The Sake Of Convenience. 2. First, We Will Take Up Ita Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 For Adjudication. The Common Ground In All These Appeals Except Change In Figures, Which Reads As Under:

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri G. Manoj Kumar, D.R
Section 153CSection 271ASection 69

…the contents of the document by proving the signatures of the handwriting of the author thereof is to set at nought, the well-recognised rule that hearsay evidence cannot be admitted. 9.3 He submitted that the Tribunal in ACIT v. Layers Exports P. Ltd [20171 53 ITR (Trib) 416 (Mumbai) held as under: - "33. In entirety of the matter, we are of the view that an addition in assessments carried out pursuant to search action u/s 132 of the Act has to be related to cogent and positive materials found during search which prove conclusively that the assessee has either earned an income or made an investment which has no…

Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 983/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 982/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 981/BANG/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 980/BANG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 979/BANG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Mrs. Ibrahim Kaleel, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 735/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Mrs. Ibrahim Kaleel, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 734/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

Mrs. Ibrahim Kaleel, Mangaluru vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Mangaluru

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 733/BANG/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)

…ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.979 to 983/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2018-19 respectively Emkay Hindustan Infrastructure D.No.20-1-19/5, Ground Floor Behar Complex, Azizuddin Road Deputy Commissioner of Bunder Income-tax Vs. Mangaluru 575 001 Central Circle-2 Mangaluru PAN NO : AAEFE5746K APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.733 to 735/Bang/2022 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 respectively Mr. Ibrahim K…

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2(2), Bangalore vs. M/S Sri Basaveshwar Veerashaiva Vidyavardhak Sangha, Bagalkote

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 66/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramasubramanian, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 35ASection 80G

…ITA Nos.2775, 2776 & 2777/Bang/2017 ITA Nos.64, 65 & 66/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.235 & 236/Bang/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2775 to 2777/Bang/2017 Assessment Years: 2012 – 13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Basaveshwar Veerashaiva Vidyavardhak Sangha, Deputy Commissioner of Hungund Road Income-tax Vs. Bagalkot 587 101 Central Circle-2(2) Bangalore PAN NO : AAAAB2169A APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.64 to 66/Bang/2018 & ITA No.234/Bang/2018 Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2013-14…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2(2), Bangalore vs. M/S Sri Basaveshwar Veerashaiva Vidyavardhak Sangha, Bagalkote

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 65/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramasubramanian, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 35ASection 80G

…ITA Nos.2775, 2776 & 2777/Bang/2017 ITA Nos.64, 65 & 66/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.235 & 236/Bang/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2775 to 2777/Bang/2017 Assessment Years: 2012 – 13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Basaveshwar Veerashaiva Vidyavardhak Sangha, Deputy Commissioner of Hungund Road Income-tax Vs. Bagalkot 587 101 Central Circle-2(2) Bangalore PAN NO : AAAAB2169A APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.64 to 66/Bang/2018 & ITA No.234/Bang/2018 Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2013-14…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2(2), Bangalore vs. M/S Sri Basaveshwar Veerashaiva Vidyavardhak Sangha, Bagalkote

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 64/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramasubramanian, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 35ASection 80G

…ITA Nos.2775, 2776 & 2777/Bang/2017 ITA Nos.64, 65 & 66/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.235 & 236/Bang/2018 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2775 to 2777/Bang/2017 Assessment Years: 2012 – 13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Basaveshwar Veerashaiva Vidyavardhak Sangha, Deputy Commissioner of Hungund Road Income-tax Vs. Bagalkot 587 101 Central Circle-2(2) Bangalore PAN NO : AAAAB2169A APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA Nos.64 to 66/Bang/2018 & ITA No.234/Bang/2018 Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2013-14…