SRI PRAKASH BHAJANDAS TALREJA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) was deleted in the quantum appeal because it was based on uncorroborated loose slips without cogent evidence. Consequently, the penalty levied under Section 271AAB could not stand.
What were the facts?
During a search on M/s Coffee Day Global Ltd., documents related to the assessee's money lending business were found. The assessee's statement under Section 132(4) admitted an undisclosed income of Rs. 1 crore. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on loose slips and the assessee's statement.
What were the issues?
Whether the conditions precedent for invoking Section 153C were satisfied and if the penalty under Section 271AAB was justified when the underlying addition was deleted due to lack of evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Sumati Dayal v. CIT1,967 citing214 ITR 801 · 1995 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society1,589 citing84 Taxmann.com 290 · 2017 · SC
- Andaman Timber Industries v. CCE1,335 citing281 CTR 241 · 2015 · SC
- Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT1,061 citing26 ITR 775 · 1954 · SC
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing131 ITR 597 · 1981 · SC
- Kishanchand Chellaram v. CIT962 citing125 ITR 713 · 1980 · SC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- PCIT v. Best Infrastructure (India) (P.) Ltd.786 citing84 Taxmann.com 287 · 2017 · HC
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Harjeev Aggarwal583 citing70 Taxmann.com 95 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son581 citing352 ITR 480 · 2013 · SC
- Lalchand Bhagat Ambica Ram v. CIT570 citing37 ITR 288 · 1959 · SC
- Umacharan Shaw & Bros. v. CIT567 citing37 ITR 271 · 1959 · SC
- Society v. UOI493 citing394 ITR 220 · 2017 · SC
- CBI v. V.C. Shukla442 citing3 SCC 410 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Odeon Builders Pvt. ltd.408 citing418 ITR 315 · 2019 · SC
- Mehta Parikh & Co. v. CIT396 citing30 ITR 181 · 1956 · SC
- CIT v. IBC Knowledge Park (P.) Ltd.371 citing385 ITR 346 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. R. Nalini Devi ITTA 232 of 2013 (A. P)299 citing294 ITR 49 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society254 citing378 ITR 84 · 2015 · HC
- Mumbai), DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal237 citing82 ITD 85 · 2002 · ITAT
- Pepsi Foods (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT225 citing367 ITR 112 · 2014 · HC
- Shri Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT225 citing174 Taxmann 466 · 2008 · HC
- CIT v. Eastern Commercial Enterprises205 citing210 ITR 103 · 1994 · HC
- Vasantlal & Co. v. CIT193 citing45 ITR 206 · 1962 · SC
- Principal Commissioner Income Tax, Central-2 v. Umesh Ishrani168 citing108 Taxmann.com 437 · 2019 · HC
- CIT v. Sant Lal154 citing118 Taxmann.com 432 · 2020 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT, Delhi v. D.K. Gupta147 citing174 Taxmann 476 · 2008 · HC
- Ltd. v. DCIT123 citing22 SOT 7 · 2008 · ITAT
- Ashwani Kumar v. ITO122 citing39 ITD 183 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The appeals in ITA Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 are emanated from the common order of CIT(A) Central Circle, Bengaluru for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2018-19 dated 16.11.2023. ITA No.1064/Bang/2023 is emanated from the order of CIT(A) dated 11.8.2023 for the assessment year 2016-17 with regard to levy of penalty u/s 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”). Since the issue in all these appeals is common in nature, these are clubbed together, heard tog
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026