M/S Amalgamated Transport & Company, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Cir-4(3), Kolkata
In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed
ITA 88/KOL/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 Oct 2017AY 2011-2012
Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year :2011-12 M/S Amalgamated V/S. Pr. Cit, Central-2, Transport & Co. 30/31, 110, Shanti Paly, Nr. Kalakar Street, Burra Ruby Hospital, Em Bye Bazar, Kolkata-007 Pass, Aayakar Poorva, [Pan No.Aapfa 6596 C] Kolkat-107 .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Md. Usman, Cit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 13-09-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 31-10-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:- This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Relating To Assessment Year 2011- 12. The Appeal Is Against The Order U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-2, Kolkata Dated 14.10.2016. Assessment Was Framed By Dcit, Central Circle-4(3), Kolkata U/S 153A/143(3) Of The Act Vide His Order Dated 31.03.2015. Grounds Raised By Assessee Per Its Appeal As Under:- “1 For That The Order Of The Ld. Pr. Cit Is Arbitrary, Illegal, Excessive & Bad In Law. 2. For That The Ld. Pr. Cit Erred In Setting Aside The Order When The Assessing Officer Applied His Mind & Correctly Assessed The Total Income In Accordance With The Documents & Evidences Seized In The Course Of Search & Therefore The Order Was Neither Erroneous Nor Prejudicial To The Interest Of Revenue.
Section 153ASection 263
…s. 153A of the Act can be determined only on the basis of incriminating material found during the course of search. The assessee in support of its claim relied on the order of Hon’ble ITAT Hyderabad Benches in the case of ACIT vs. B. Srinivasa Rao reported in 159 TTJ 483 wherein it was held as under : “Further, unless there is evidence or material indicating any suppression of collection of fees towards management quota seats for A.Y. 2003-2004 having been found during search, and no admission from assessee, AO was not justified in estimating same on materials seized relating to subsequent assessment years indica…